M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Robinhood CEO Reaffirms Support for Crypto Bill
Cryptocurrency

Robinhood CEO Reaffirms Support for Crypto Bill

The Block1h ago
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ The Senate Banking Committee postponed a markup hearing for crypto market structure legislation late Wednesday.
  • ✓ Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill, prompting the delay in the legislative process.
  • ✓ Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev publicly reaffirmed his commitment to the crypto market structure bill.
  • ✓ The legislation aims to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States.
  • ✓ Markup hearings are critical stages where lawmakers debate and amend legislation before it moves to the full Senate floor.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. Legislative Delay
  3. Industry Stance
  4. Regulatory Context
  5. What's Next
  6. Looking Ahead

Quick Summary#

The path to comprehensive cryptocurrency regulation in the United States has hit another delay. The Senate Banking Committee postponed a crucial markup hearing for market structure legislation late Wednesday.

The delay follows a significant development: Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill. Despite this setback, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev has publicly reaffirmed his commitment to the legislation, signaling continued industry interest in establishing clearer rules for digital assets.

Legislative Delay#

The Senate Banking Committee was scheduled to hold a markup hearing for the crypto market structure bill. A markup hearing is a critical stage where lawmakers debate, amend, and vote on legislation before it moves to the full Senate floor.

The hearing was postponed late Wednesday. The timing of the delay is notable, as it occurred just as the legislative process was advancing.

The postponement directly resulted from a shift in industry support. Coinbase, a major cryptocurrency exchange, pulled its backing for the bill. This withdrawal likely influenced the committee's decision to delay the hearing.

Industry Stance#

While one major player stepped back, another doubled down. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev reaffirmed his support for the crypto market structure bill. Robinhood has been an active participant in the crypto space, offering trading services to millions of users.

Tenev's public commitment underscores the divided landscape within the cryptocurrency industry. Different companies may have varying priorities regarding regulatory frameworks.

The bill aims to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets. Key objectives likely include:

  • Defining the jurisdiction of regulatory bodies
  • Clarifying rules for crypto exchanges and brokers
  • Establishing investor protection measures
  • Creating a clear path for crypto innovation

Regulatory Context#

The Senate Banking Committee plays a pivotal role in shaping financial regulation in the United States. Its decisions impact the future of the entire cryptocurrency market.

Market structure legislation is designed to provide clarity. For years, the crypto industry has operated in a regulatory gray area, facing scrutiny from multiple agencies.

A clear framework could legitimize the industry and protect investors. However, achieving consensus among lawmakers and industry stakeholders has proven difficult. The postponement highlights the complexity of balancing innovation with consumer protection.

What's Next#

The future of the bill is now uncertain. The Senate Banking Committee will need to reschedule the markup hearing. The new date depends on when lawmakers can address the concerns raised by Coinbase's withdrawal.

Industry observers will watch closely for any changes to the bill's language. Vlad Tenev's continued support suggests Robinhood may advocate for specific provisions that align with its business model.

The delay does not mean the legislation is dead. It simply reflects the complex political process required to pass significant financial regulation. Stakeholders on all sides will continue to engage with lawmakers.

Looking Ahead#

The crypto market structure bill remains a focal point for the industry. While the Senate Banking Committee has delayed its review, the conversation around regulation continues.

Vlad Tenev's reaffirmation of support demonstrates that key industry leaders remain committed to the goal of clear regulation. The path forward will require navigating the differing interests of various stakeholders.

Ultimately, the legislation aims to provide a stable environment for the cryptocurrency market to grow. The next steps will involve renewed negotiations and potentially revised proposals to address the concerns that led to the current delay.

#Companies#Exchanges#Finance firms#Policy#U.S. Policymaking#market structure bill#Robinhood

Continue scrolling for more

Is Bitcoin Heading for a ‘Parabolic Blowoff’ Mirroring Gold? Analysts Weigh In
Cryptocurrency

Is Bitcoin Heading for a ‘Parabolic Blowoff’ Mirroring Gold? Analysts Weigh In

Analysts debate whether Bitcoin will follow gold's scarcity-driven surge or take a more volatile path due to structural market differences.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Politics

European troops arrive in Greenland as US and Denmark talks fail to resolve dispute

The deployment was announced the same day the foreign ministers of Denmark and Greenland met with US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Sen. Mark Kelly is suing the Pentagon. Legal experts say veterans' rights are at stake.
Politics

Sen. Mark Kelly is suing the Pentagon. Legal experts say veterans' rights are at stake.

Sen. Mark Kelly said his lawsuit is about fighting back on the Pentagon's crackdown on speech. Heather Diehl/Getty Images Senator Mark Kelly sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Pentagon's speech crackdown. Kelly's lawsuit challenges Pentagon actions targeting retirees' political speech and benefits. Legal experts warn the case could impact First Amendment rights for retired US military personnel. A new lawsuit from a Democratic senator and combat veteran at the heart of a free speech fight seeks to block the Pentagon's intensifying crackdown. Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly sued Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday, warning that the Pentagon's effort to punish him "sends a chilling message" to veterans who speak out against the Trump administration. Hegseth accused Kelly of "seditious" acts after Kelly publicly reminded US service members that they are not required to follow illegal orders. The Pentagon's actions against Kelly have troubling implications for the political speech of millions of veterans, military law experts said. Hegseth's effort to muzzle a US senator "places other retirees who have spoken up potentially in jeopardy," said Rachel VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Law School who is a retired Air Force JAG. "Not knowing whether or not he's going to come after you already has a chilling effect." Kelly said his lawsuit is about fighting back. The Democratic lawmaker announced the federal lawsuit on Monday. His suit also named the Department of Defense, Navy Secretary John Phelan, and the Navy Department as defendants. Kelly's video urging troops not to follow illegal orders. Veterans who serve 20 years or more are eligible for a military pension, but those benefits can be revoked or reduced if retirees are found to have violated military law while in uniform. By contrast, Hegseth's move seeks to punish a veteran for his speech long after serving in uniform, an approach one expert on military law called baseless. Kelly's lawsuit argues that using the military justice system to punish veterans' political speech risks setting a precedent that abuses the First Amendment rights of other retired troops. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth standing in front of a Department of War sign DoW photo by U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Madelyn Keech Legal basis in question The lawsuit argues that nothing in the law allows the Pentagon to revisit a retirement determination based on a veteran's speech. Such a move, the filing says, would raise "serious constitutional concerns" and leave retired service members facing a constant threat to their earned benefits. There's no legal basis for Hegseth's pursuit, VanLandingham said. The defense secretary initially sought to court-martial Kelly, threatening him with the military equivalent of a criminal trial. It later opted for a lesser administrative punishment. "The process is the punishment," said Frank Rosenblatt, a retired Army JAG and professor at Mississippi College School of Law. "The claim against Kelly had no merit." "Senator Kelly's speech is not punishable under the UCMJ," the National Institute of Military Justice nonprofit group said in a December statement in reference to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The lawsuit seeks to halt actions that could reduce Kelly's military rank and retirement pay and characterizes that effort as "unlawful." After filing the lawsuit, Kelly requested a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction from the federal court, seeking to halt the Pentagon's actions while the case is reviewed on its merits. Both are emergency measures that ask a judge to stop government action before permanent harm occurs. The federal government has been increasingly pushing cases important to the Trump administration onto a "rocket docket," Rosenblatt said, accelerating litigation toward higher courts. If the judge assigned to the case, US District Judge Richard Leon, issues a ruling the government doesn't like, "this could move very quickly to the DC Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court." Leon has previously ruled against the military's authority over retirees. "I am not concluding today that Congress could never authorize the court-martial of some military retirees," Leon wrote in a 2019 memorandum opinion that rejected the government's argument that military jurisdiction over all retirees was necessary to maintain good order and discipline of its active force. The judge noted he had not seen a clear argument for "why the exercise of such jurisdiction over all military retirees is necessary." In a post on X last week, Hegseth called Kelly's video with five other Democratic lawmakers "reckless and seditious" and said it was "clearly intended to undermine good order and military discipline." The military justice provisions that Hegseth accused Kelly of violating — Articles 133 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice — are not explicitly tied to sedition and can cover a wide range of alleged misconduct. Kelly's lawsuit argues that allowing the executive branch to punish a member of Congress for speech is a threat to the Constitution and erodes congressional oversight of the armed services. "We are aware of the litigation," a Pentagon spokesperson said Tuesday when asked for comment on the lawsuit. "However, as a matter of policy, the Department does not comment on ongoing litigation." That same day, Hegseth took aim at Kelly's military rank in an X post: "'Captain' Kelly knows exactly what he did, and that he will be held to account." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Why I'm Staying in Massachusetts Despite the Millionaire's Tax
Politics

Why I'm Staying in Massachusetts Despite the Millionaire's Tax

Sam Slater, a real estate developer and minority owner of the Seattle Kraken and Memphis Grizzlies, shares why he's choosing to stay in Massachusetts despite paying the millionaire's tax and considering a move to Florida.

1h
7 min
6
Read Article
LSEG Launches Digital Settlement House for Commercial Bank Money
Economics

LSEG Launches Digital Settlement House for Commercial Bank Money

The London Stock Exchange's new Digital Settlement House uses tokenized bank deposits for instant, round-the-clock settlement across blockchain and traditional payment networks.

1h
5 min
6
Read Article
Nvidia's Strategic Hiring Spree: Key Leaders Joining and Leaving
Technology

Nvidia's Strategic Hiring Spree: Key Leaders Joining and Leaving

Nvidia has added high-profile marketing, policy, and HR executives over the past year, while executive turnover appeared to slow in 2025.

1h
7 min
6
Read Article
OpenAI Dominates Enterprise AI Market as Business Spending Surges
Technology

OpenAI Dominates Enterprise AI Market as Business Spending Surges

Corporate adoption of artificial intelligence accelerated dramatically in December 2025, with nearly half of all US businesses now paying for AI services. OpenAI emerged as the clear winner, capturing record market share while competitors struggle to keep pace.

1h
6 min
6
Read Article
A16z Partner Reveals 3 Keys to Founder Success
Technology

A16z Partner Reveals 3 Keys to Founder Success

Andreessen Horowitz general partner Alex Rampell outlines the trifecta of skills every successful founder needs to master to secure venture funding and build lasting companies.

1h
5 min
6
Read Article
Bank of America CEO Warns of $6T Stablecoin Shift
Economics

Bank of America CEO Warns of $6T Stablecoin Shift

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan has issued a stark warning about the potential impact of stablecoin yield rules, suggesting they could shift up to $6 trillion in deposits from traditional banks.

1h
5 min
12
Read Article
Silicon Valley's 'Prove It' Year: Workers Face Heightened Scrutiny
Technology

Silicon Valley's 'Prove It' Year: Workers Face Heightened Scrutiny

Across Silicon Valley, 2026 is shaping up to be a 'show-your-work' year. With billions invested in AI, tech giants are demanding proof of productivity from employees.

1h
5 min
13
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home