M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Winning the Lottery: Why Big Jackpots Can Lead to Bankruptcy
Economics

Winning the Lottery: Why Big Jackpots Can Lead to Bankruptcy

While the allure of a billion-dollar lottery jackpot is strong, research indicates that sudden wealth often leads to financial ruin. Studies reveal that many winners spend their money rapidly or make poor investments, leading to bankruptcy.

G1 GloboDec 26
5 min read
📋

Quick Summary

  • 15 billion Mega Millions jackpot to a more manageable sum, the challenge remains.
  • 23 billion but declared bankruptcy 70 years later, serves as a stark warning.

Contents

The Mathematics of WinningThe Reality of Sudden WealthThe Cost of Spending EverythingA Cautionary Tale

Quick Summary#

The dream of winning a massive lottery jackpot captivates millions, but academic studies suggest that sudden wealth can be a financial trap. Research indicates that despite the astronomical odds against winning, the real challenge begins after the prize is claimed. Financial experts note that the actual payout is significantly lower than the advertised jackpot due to taxes and payment options. Furthermore, behavioral studies reveal a tendency for winners to spend unexpected money rapidly, often leading to financial instability. Historical examples, such as the decline of Huntington Hartford, demonstrate that even billion-dollar fortunes can be lost through poor management and excessive spending. The following analysis explores the mathematics of winning, the reality of post-win finances, and the psychological factors that contribute to the "lottery curse."

The Mathematics of Winning#

Winning a lottery jackpot is statistically improbable. The odds of winning the Mega Millions jackpot in the United States were approximately 1 in 303 million. To put this in perspective, a person is about 400 times more likely to be struck by lightning. Even if every adult in the United States purchased a single ticket with unique numbers, there would still be a roughly 7% chance that no one would win, allowing the jackpot to grow even larger.

When a winner is finally announced, the financial reality sets in immediately. The advertised jackpot is rarely the amount deposited into the winner's bank account. For example, when the Mega Millions jackpot reached US$ 1.5 billion in 2018, the winner had to choose between an annuity or a lump-sum cash value. The lump-sum option was approximately US$ 878 million, significantly less than the headline figure. Even after selecting the cash option, government taxes take a substantial cut.

  • Federal taxes reduced the 2018 prize by US$ 211 million.
  • State taxes vary; for instance, South Carolina imposes an additional 7% tax on winnings.
  • After all deductions, a US$ 1.5 billion jackpot could result in a net payout of roughly US$ 606 million.

The Reality of Sudden Wealth#

Once the funds are secured, the behavior of the recipient becomes the critical factor in long-term financial health. A study analyzing the financial habits of lottery winners found that, on average, they saved only 16 cents for every dollar received about a decade after their win. This pattern of spending is consistent with findings by economists Guido Imbens and Bruce Sacerdote, who noted that people tend to spend unexpected windfalls more freely than earned income.

Research by Jay L. Zagorsky of Boston University further illustrates this trend. His work shows that individuals who receive inheritances or large financial gifts in their 20s, 30s, and 40s often lose half of that money quickly due to poor spending habits or bad investments. This suggests that a lack of financial maturity can lead to rapid wealth depletion regardless of the initial amount.

Specific studies on lottery outcomes paint a grim picture for those who are already in financial difficulty. Contrary to popular belief, winning the lottery does not always solve money problems; it often delays the inevitable. One specific study revealed that one-third of lottery winners eventually lose everything.

The Cost of Spending Everything#

It may seem difficult to spend hundreds of millions of dollars, but data suggests it is easier than it appears. Demographic research shows that lottery participation peaks among people aged 30 to 39. Assuming a winner is in this age group, they might have approximately 45 years to spend their fortune. If a winner retains US$ 900 million after taxes, they would need to spend roughly US$ 20 million per year to exhaust the funds, assuming the money generates no interest.

However, spending the money does not necessarily mean losing wealth. If a winner purchases tangible assets such as real estate, art, or luxury vehicles, their net worth remains intact. Bankruptcy in this context results from "torrando" (burning) the cash on intangible experiences or liabilities without retaining assets. A winner who spends money on experiences rather than investments ends up with nothing to show for their windfall.

A Cautionary Tale 📉#

The story of Huntington Hartford serves as the ultimate example of how a massive fortune can vanish. Hartford inherited the fortune of the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A&P), a supermarket chain that was the Walmart of its era. At the age of 12, he received approximately US$ 90 million, which, adjusted for inflation and taxation, is equivalent to over US$ 1.3 billion today.

Despite this immense wealth, Hartford declared bankruptcy in 1992, nearly 70 years after inheriting his fortune. He lost millions through a combination of poor business acumen and an exceptionally luxurious lifestyle. His expenditures included:

  • Buying extensive real estate.
  • Creating an art museum.
  • Sponsoring theatrical productions and spectacles.

After his financial collapse, Hartford lived reclusively in the Bahamas until his death. His life, combined with academic research, illustrates that money received unexpectedly requires careful management. Without a strategy to preserve capital, even a billion-dollar jackpot can lead to financial ruin.

Frequently Asked Questions

Lottery winners often go bankrupt because they tend to spend unexpected money much faster than earned income. Studies indicate poor investment choices and excessive spending habits lead to the rapid depletion of funds.

A winner typically receives significantly less than the advertised amount. They must choose between a lump-sum cash value (often half the jackpot) or annual payments, and both options are subject to heavy federal and state taxes.

#G1

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
172
Read Article
Bitcoin Advocates Push Congress on Stablecoin Tax Rules
Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin Advocates Push Congress on Stablecoin Tax Rules

Leading cryptocurrency advocates are calling on lawmakers to broaden digital currency tax exemptions, arguing that narrow focus on stablecoins misses the mark for mainstream adoption and payment innovation.

1h
5 min
6
Read Article
Politics

Death toll from Iran's crackdown on protests jumps to at least 2,571, activists say

The figure analysts say dwarfs the death toll from any other round of protest or unrest in Iran in decades and recalls the chaos surrounding the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'
Technology

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'

Ben Horowitz said investment teams should be the size of a playing five in basketball. Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED Ben Horowitz said his rule of thumb is about five people on an investing team. He said Andreessen Horowitz maintains lean teams and strong communication across verticals. AI tools are enabling startups and VCs to thrive with fewer employees. Ben Horowitz is a big fan of tiny teams. On an episode of the A16z podcast, the Andreessen Horowitz cofounder shared how his venture capital firm maintains a lean operation despite being one of the world's largest. "An investing team shouldn't be too much bigger than a basketball team," he said, referring to advice he got from famed American investor David Swensen in 2009. He added, "A basketball team is five people who start, and the reason for that is the conversation around the investments really needs to be a conversation." Horowitz cofounded the Silicon Valley VC firm with Marc Andreessen in 2009. Before A16Z, he ran enterprise software company Opsware, which Hewlett-Packard acquired. A16z has backed marquee companies including Meta, Airbnb, GitHub, and Coinbase. The VC said he always kept the basketball team size in mind but also knew that the firm had to expand to keep up with how "software was eating the world," his signature phrase. The solution was to split the firm into different investment verticals. To maintain good communication, staff attend other teams' meetings when investment themes overlap. The firm also organizes a two to three-day offsite twice a year, "with not much agenda." Horowitz said that people who join them from other firms say that A16Z has "less politics" than firms with 10 or 11 people because his firm has a culture where politicking is "disincentivized." A16z might have been early to the tiny team trend, but it's catching on fast with VCs and startups across the world. Startups are actively seeking to stay small, with many having fewer than 10 people. Founders told Business Insider that AI and vibe coding tools have boosted their productivity, allowing them to get things done with far fewer people. Less politics and bureaucracy are also big pluses, they say. "We're going to see 10-person companies with billion-dollar valuations pretty soon," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in February 2024. "In my little group chat with my tech CEO friends, there's this betting pool for the first year there is a one-person billion-dollar company, which would've been unimaginable without AI. And now will happen." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

1h
5 min
3
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.
Politics

Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.

Its security forces have brutally defended the Islamic Republic, but the protests show that many Iranians consider it stagnant and ideologically hollow.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record
Science

Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record

2025 saw a cooling phase in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, yet heat from greenhouse gases countered that cooling enough that the year still was among the warmest.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
С больным сидеть и день и ночь // Система долговременного ухода за пожилыми присматривается к зарплате граждан
Economics

С больным сидеть и день и ночь // Система долговременного ухода за пожилыми присматривается к зарплате граждан

Опубликованная в «Финансовом журнале» НИФИ Минфина статья «Финансирование долговременного ухода в России: возможен ли переход к страховой модели?» предлагает расчеты нескольких сценариев, в которых работа системы долговременного ухода (СДУ) будет покрываться дополнительными соцвзносами. Изъять необходимые суммы в размере 0,5–3 трлн руб. в год из фонда оплаты труда предлагается добавочными платежами по ставке от 1% до 5% зарплаты в зависимости от охвата ухода. Дискуссия о средствах для системы ведется с самого начала ее реализации, но сама она уже вписана в нацпроект, а при напряженном бюджете рассчитывать на ее финансирование за счет нынешних госдоходов вряд ли можно, так что де-факто авторы поднимают вопрос о том, сколько и за какой уход в старости граждане готовы доплатить.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home