M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Trump Exits UN Climate Treaties: Global Impact
Politics

Trump Exits UN Climate Treaties: Global Impact

The Guardian5d ago
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ Donald Trump has withdrawn the US from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
  • ✓ The US is also exiting the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
  • ✓ Global temperatures, sea levels, and greenhouse gas emissions are rising.
  • ✓ The international community has persevered with climate action despite US intransigence for 30 years.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. The Withdrawal Announcement
  3. Global Climate Context
  4. Limited Impact on Science and Action
  5. Conclusion

Quick Summary#

Donald Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This move signals a major departure from international climate cooperation. Despite the significance of the announcement, experts suggest the decision will likely have little effect on climate action outside of the US.

The withdrawal occurs against a backdrop of urgent environmental challenges. The world is currently facing rapidly rising temperatures and rising sea levels. Greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, and the financial burden of extreme weather is mounting. There is a growing danger that the planet will trigger irreversible 'tipping points' in the climate system. The US president's decision does not alter these scientific realities. The international community has historically persevered with climate action despite US resistance, and this latest development is viewed by many as a continuation of that dynamic.

The Withdrawal Announcement#

Donald Trump has announced the United States' withdrawal from two major international climate bodies. The decision targets the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The move has generated outrage among international observers and organizations. This decision is described as a latest attack on climate action.

The withdrawal extends beyond the UN bodies. Reports indicate the decision includes the termination of ties with dozens of international organizations related to climate efforts. This comprehensive exit marks a significant shift in the United States' stance on global environmental policy. It isolates the US from the primary international frameworks designed to coordinate global responses to climate change.

Global Climate Context 🌍#

The announcement comes at a critical moment in global climate history. Environmental indicators show a planet under stress. Temperatures are rising rapidly across the globe. Sea levels are continuing their upward trend, threatening coastal communities worldwide.

Greenhouse gas emissions remain stubbornly high, defying efforts to curb them. The costs associated with extreme weather events are becoming increasingly burdensome for economies. Perhaps most concerning is the scientific consensus regarding 'tipping points'. These are thresholds in the climate system that, once crossed, could lead to catastrophic and irreversible changes. The urgency of these issues provides a stark backdrop to the political decision to withdraw from climate treaties.

Limited Impact on Science and Action#

Despite the political weight of cursor-pointer">the US withdrawal, the fundamental realities of climate change remain unaltered. The decision to leave the UNFCCC and IPCC does not change the scientific data regarding global warming. The physical processes driving climate change continue to operate regardless of US political participation.

International observers note that the global community has extensive experience navigating US intransigence. For much of the last 30 years, other nations have been forced to persevere with climate action despite resistance from the United States. Consequently, the international community is expected to continue its efforts. The withdrawal is viewed by many as a 'colossal own goal' for the US, potentially harming American influence while failing to stop global climate momentum.

Conclusion#

The decision by Donald Trump to withdraw the United States from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change represents a significant political shift. However, the practical implications for global climate action appear limited. The international community remains focused on the urgent realities of rising temperatures, sea levels, and emissions.

History suggests that global climate efforts can continue without full US cooperation. The scientific imperatives driving climate action remain unchanged. As the world faces the threat of irreversible tipping points, the focus remains on collective action to mitigate environmental damage, regardless of the political stance of individual nations.

#Climate crisis#Trump administration#Donald Trump#United Nations#Paris climate agreement#Environment#US politics#US news#World news

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
172
Read Article
A new American missile-mounted buggy has already scored over 20 kills against Russian Shaheds in Ukraine, crew says
World_news

A new American missile-mounted buggy has already scored over 20 kills against Russian Shaheds in Ukraine, crew says

The Tempest fires into the night sky in this video provided by Ukraine's Air Command Central. Screenshot via Facebook/Ukraine Air Command Central Ukraine has deployed an off-road buggy mounted with guided missiles to destroy Shaheds. A Ukrainian operator said on video that the new American vehicle had already downed 21 Russian drones. Called the Tempest, it's a US-built system that likely fires radar-guided Hellfire missiles. Ukraine's air defense forces said they've destroyed at least 21 Russian Shaheds with a new American light vehicle that fires guided missiles from its back. The vehicle, called the Tempest, featured in a video posted on Tuesday by Ukraine's Air Command for the country's central region. The footage showed at least three video clips of the system firing into the night sky, its missile arcing upward to track its target. "As of now, our crew has destroyed 21 Shahed drones," said a Ukrainian soldier, identified by Air Command Central as an operator with the call-sign "Shorty," in the video. The four-wheeled, off-road buggy is equipped with a dual launcher that appears to be fitted with missiles that look like the AGM-114 Hellfire. These American-made missiles typically require the assistance of a laser to track their targets and are often fired from aircraft such as the MQ-9 Reaper and the AH-64 Apache. The Tempest, however, likely uses the Longbow variant, which instead uses radar to home in on targets in a fire-and-forget fashion. The Hellfire Longbow carries a 9-kilogram, or 20-pound, warhead. The Ukrainian video did not specifically identify the type of missile used. The company that built the Tempest, V2X, is a Virginia-headquartered firm that's also pitching the vehicle to the US Army. "This machine keeps the sky locked down," Shorty said in the air command video. He added that his crew was previously deployed to Ukraine's eastern regions, saying that they destroyed "all targets" they attacked there. Other clips of the Tempest in action showed the buggy maneuvering in open fields, muddy terrain, and on a road. Mobility is a key need for Ukraine's fight against Russian Shahed drones. Because these loitering munitions fly at speeds exceeding 100 mph, air defense crews only have a short time after detecting a target to arrive at an ideal firing location and launch. Ukrainian troops once relied on trucks mounted with machine guns, but had to scramble for other options as Russia significantly increased the number of drones launched and started adapting to fly Shaheds at higher altitudes. Hellfire missiles vs Shaheds The sheer quantity of Shaheds that Ukraine often faces means that it needs lower-cost munitions to take them down. A congressional report from 2021 said that from 1998 to that year, the US spent roughly $10.9 billion, adjusted for inflation, on buying about 87,500 Hellfire missiles. That's about $123,000 per missile, though that figure would also include costs such as training, launchers, software, and support equipment. Prices can also vary for different variants of the missile, and the Longbow's radar guidance likely results in it being on the more expensive side. Meanwhile, Ukrainian officials estimate that Russia can produce older Shaheds at roughly $35,000 each, though Moscow was believed to likely be making them at $70,000 apiece in 2025. It's unclear what the cost ratio is between a Tempest launch and a Shahed or Gerbera, which are decoy drones that Russia deploys to give Ukrainians more targets to attack. When debuting the Tempest to the US Army in October 2025, V2X said the vehicle is made with commercial off-the-shelf components and can be offered as a stationary, trailer-mounted launcher. It's also unclear how many Tempests are deployed in Ukraine. Only one vehicle appears onscreen at a time, and Ukraine is known to openly invite foreign weapons companies to test their products on the battlefield. Notably, the same clips of the Tempest firing, cropped to conceal the vehicle, appeared in an earlier New Year's montage published by Air Command Central, indicating that the vehicle has been in Ukraine since December. Ukraine has increasingly relied on small first-person-view drones that are tweaked to fly extremely quickly and serve as interceptors. While these can cost as little as $2,000 each, they typically also require a human pilot and crew to successfully track, chase, and destroy a Shahed drone. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.
Politics

Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.

Its security forces have brutally defended the Islamic Republic, but the protests show that many Iranians consider it stagnant and ideologically hollow.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record
Science

Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record

2025 saw a cooling phase in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, yet heat from greenhouse gases countered that cooling enough that the year still was among the warmest.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
С больным сидеть и день и ночь // Система долговременного ухода за пожилыми присматривается к зарплате граждан
Economics

С больным сидеть и день и ночь // Система долговременного ухода за пожилыми присматривается к зарплате граждан

Опубликованная в «Финансовом журнале» НИФИ Минфина статья «Финансирование долговременного ухода в России: возможен ли переход к страховой модели?» предлагает расчеты нескольких сценариев, в которых работа системы долговременного ухода (СДУ) будет покрываться дополнительными соцвзносами. Изъять необходимые суммы в размере 0,5–3 трлн руб. в год из фонда оплаты труда предлагается добавочными платежами по ставке от 1% до 5% зарплаты в зависимости от охвата ухода. Дискуссия о средствах для системы ведется с самого начала ее реализации, но сама она уже вписана в нацпроект, а при напряженном бюджете рассчитывать на ее финансирование за счет нынешних госдоходов вряд ли можно, так что де-факто авторы поднимают вопрос о том, сколько и за какой уход в старости граждане готовы доплатить.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Paris 2028 Unveils Million-Dollar Ticket Initiative
Sports

Paris 2028 Unveils Million-Dollar Ticket Initiative

In a move to make the Games accessible to all, organizers are releasing one million tickets for the 2028 Olympics at a fixed price of $28, with a registration and lottery system set to begin this Wednesday.

1h
5 min
1
Read Article
Politics

East Jerusalem Schools Strike Over Teacher Permits

Classes for approximately 20,000 students were suspended across private institutions in East Jerusalem as educators and administrators protest what they describe as arbitrary new limitations on work permits for teachers residing in the West Bank.

1h
3 min
1
Read Article
Progressive Government Targets Housing Inequality
Politics

Progressive Government Targets Housing Inequality

A new legislative focus identifies housing as the central battleground for social justice, aiming to dismantle speculative market forces and secure the fundamental right to shelter.

1h
5 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home