M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Toyota Prius Prime Review: Cost Savings vs Environmental Impact
Automotive

Toyota Prius Prime Review: Cost Savings vs Environmental Impact

EngadgetDec 24
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ The 2024 Toyota Prius Prime achieved 30 miles of electric range on highways and over 40 miles in city driving during real-world testing
  • ✓ Operating costs totaled $13.50 for 350 miles of mixed driving, combining $7.50 in fuel and $6.00 in electricity
  • ✓ The Prius Prime XSE costs $5,325 more than the standard Prius hybrid, with annual savings of only $209
  • ✓ European research found plug-in hybrids run in all-electric mode only 27% of the time, resulting in emissions five times higher than estimated
  • ✓ The vehicle features a combined 220 horsepower output with 44-mile EPA electric range

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. Design and Performance Evaluation
  3. Real-World Range and Efficiency Testing
  4. Economic Analysis: True Cost Savings
  5. Environmental Impact and Infrastructure Challenges

Quick Summary#

A two-month rental of the 2024 Toyota Prius Prime in Vancouver demonstrated the vehicle's impressive efficiency and low operating costs, with total fuel and electricity expenses of just $13.50 over 350 mixed driving miles.

The fifth-generation model features a sleek redesign, 220 horsepower combined output, and 44-mile EPA electric range, though real-world testing achieved 30 miles on highways and over 40 miles in city driving.

Despite the vehicle's excellent performance and economy, financial analysis reveals limited savings compared to standard hybrids. The Prius Prime XSE costs $5,325 more than its non-plug-in counterpart, with annual savings of only $209 when factoring in electricity costs.

European research indicates plug-in hybrids run in all-electric mode just 27% of the time rather than the estimated 84%, resulting in emissions five times higher than projected. Issues include inconsistent charging by drivers, lack of accessible charging infrastructure, and electric motors insufficient for certain driving maneuvers.

While the Prius Prime represents an economical choice among plug-in hybrids, the data suggests it may not be the environmental or financial solution many consumers expect.

Design and Performance Evaluation 🚗#

The 2024 Toyota Prius Prime represents a significant departure from previous generations with its wedge-shaped design introduced for 2023. The sleek aerodynamic profile improves efficiency while addressing the vehicle's historical reputation as a "staid hippie econobox." The lower ground clearance creates challenges for entry, particularly for taller or older individuals.

Interior comfort proved adequate during extensive testing. The well-bolstered, heated seats remained comfortable during two 10-hour highway drives to northern Canada. However, visibility suffers due to the low seating position and thick front pillars that occasionally obstructed traffic views.

The cabin features an 8-inch touchscreen with wraparound dash design and includes wireless CarPlay and Android Auto support. Driver assistance features such as lane-keeping, adaptive cruise control, and automatic braking enhanced confidence in Vancouver traffic.

Performance specifications show substantial improvements over previous models:

  • Two-liter gas motor producing 150 HP
  • Electric motor generating 161 HP
  • Net combined output of 220 HP (100 HP increase)
  • 0-60 mph acceleration in 6.7 seconds
  • 13.6 kWh battery with 10.9 kWh usable capacity

Charging requires four hours at 240 volts or eight hours at 120 volts. The vehicle lacks DC fast-charging capability. The EPA electric range stands at 44 miles, representing a 19-mile improvement over the fourth-generation model.

Real-World Range and Efficiency Testing 🔋#

Actual driving range varied significantly from EPA estimates during testing. On highways at approximately 65 mph, the vehicle achieved 30 miles of electric-only range. City driving yielded better results, with over 40 miles on a single charge.

Practical commuting scenarios demonstrated the vehicle's capabilities:

  • 30-mile trip from city center to suburb with partial return charge remaining
  • 13-mile cross-city commute between Vancouver's eastern and western points with 25% charge remaining
  • Consistent daily driving of 25 miles with minimal fuel consumption

Operating costs over a two-week period with consistent charging were remarkably low. Fuel consumption totaled approximately one-quarter tank ($7.50), while electricity usage of 70.5 kWh cost $6.00 at $0.085 per kWh. Total expenses of $13.50 for 350 miles of mixed driving.

Long-distance performance remained impressive. A 547-mile journey covered 470 miles before requiring refueling, with one-quarter tank remaining. The fill-up cost approximately $25.

The all-electric mode proved significantly more enjoyable than hybrid operation, offering quieter, smoother performance with reduced noise and vibration levels.

Economic Analysis: True Cost Savings 💰#

Financial comparison between plug-in hybrid and standard hybrid variants reveals limited economic advantage. The tested Prius Prime XSE lists at $37,320 with typical selling price of $34,590. The equivalent standard Prius XTE lists at $31,995, creating a $5,325 price differential.

Annual operating cost calculations based on average US driving patterns (13,662 miles per year) show:

  • Standard Prius (50 MPG combined): $819 in annual fuel costs
  • Prius Prime: $160 in fuel plus $450 in electricity = $610 total
  • Annual savings: $209
  • 10-year savings: $2,090 (insufficient to offset initial price premium)

These figures assume generous 85% reduction in fuel consumption and average US electricity pricing of $0.18/kWh. Regional variations in fuel and electricity costs significantly impact actual savings.

The economic equation worsens when considering real-world usage patterns. European research from Transport & Environment analyzed data from 800,000 vehicles and found plug-in hybrids operate in all-electric mode only 27% of the time, far below the 84% estimate used in European WLPT standards.

This discrepancy results in actual emissions five times higher than projected and annual operating costs approximately $586 higher than expected. Similar patterns likely exist in the US market.

Environmental Impact and Infrastructure Challenges 🌍#

Multiple factors contribute to the gap between expected and actual plug-in hybrid performance. Charging infrastructure remains a primary obstacle. Public charging stations proved difficult to locate and use, often requiring app sign-ups rather than simple credit card transactions. Electricity pricing at public stations frequently exceeds gasoline costs on a per-mile basis.

Driver behavior significantly impacts environmental benefits. Many owners, particularly those with company or fleet vehicles, fail to charge consistently. The relatively short electric range requires daily charging to maintain all-electric operation, a habit many drivers don't adopt.

Technical limitations also reduce electric-only operation. The electric motors in many plug-in hybrids lack sufficient power for demanding maneuvers like passing, forcing the internal combustion engine to engage even during supposed all-electric driving. This issue particularly affects heavier sedans and SUVs.

Battery size presents a counterintuitive problem. Vehicles with ranges exceeding 45 miles often show increased emissions because larger batteries add significant weight. According to research, long-range plug-in hybrids average 28% more mass and 33% more engine power than shorter-range models.

Manufacturer priorities compound these issues. Consumer demand for SUVs has led to plug-in hybrid designs where electric motors cannot sustain all-electric operation during all driving conditions. Additionally, most plug-in hybrids lack DC fast-charging capability.

The Toyota Prius Prime stands out as an exception among plug-in hybrids due to its excellent electric range and sufficiently powerful electric motor that minimizes internal combustion engine engagement. It also achieves the highest EPA mileage rating of any non-electric vehicle sold in North America.

However, the broader data suggests plug-in hybrids may represent a compromise that satisfies neither environmental goals nor economic expectations. Until infrastructure, charging behavior, and technical design issues are resolved, standard hybrids may offer better real-world value, while pure electric vehicles provide superior environmental benefits.

# Renewable Energy & Energy Saving # Autos # Transportation # Environment # Nature & Environment # site|engadget # provider_name|Engadget # region|US # language|en-US # author_name|Steve Dent

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
175
Read Article
How business leaders are responding to Trump's plan to cap credit card interest rates, from JPMorgan to SoFi
Politics

How business leaders are responding to Trump's plan to cap credit card interest rates, from JPMorgan to SoFi

Business leaders like Klarna's CEO support Trump's credit card cap proposal, while major banks and investors warn of risks. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images Donald Trump proposes a 10% cap on credit card interest rates starting January 20, 2026. Business leaders like Klarna's CEO support the cap, while major banks and investors warn of risks. The proposal sparks debate on consumer protection, credit access, and industry profitability. Business leaders have mixed reviews of President Donald Trump's new plan for credit cards. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said on Friday he would call for a one-year cap of 10% on credit card interest rates, arguing that consumers are being "ripped off" by rates that he said can be as high as 20% or 30%. Congress, not the president, has the power to implement such a cap. Similar proposals have previously stalled on Capitol Hill. Major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, UBS, and Citi, warned that a 10% cap could reduce access to credit; others in the financial sector applauded the plan. Here is how business leaders have responded so far Sebastian Siemiatkowski Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO and cofounder of Klarna, at the fintech company's IPO on September 10. Bloomberg / Contributor / Getty Images/Reuters Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski backs Trump's plan. Siemiatkowski told CNBC in an interview on Monday that traditional credit cards are built to encourage consumers to put most of their spending on credit, and then carry big balances at steep interest rates. That dynamic, he said, pushes people to borrow more than they should and results in higher losses, especially among lower-income borrowers. "I think Trump is wise here and is proposing something that makes a lot of sense," Siemiatkowski told CNBC on Monday. "Capitalism is great, but anarchy is not," Siemiatkowski added regarding consumer protection. In another interview with CNN, Siemiatkowski also said that credit card rewards like cash back and airline miles largely benefit wealthier consumers while lower-income cardholders shoulder more of the costs. Jeremy Barnum JPMorgan Chase CFO Jeremy Barnum speaks at the bank's 2025 Investor Day presentation in New York City on May 19. JPMorgan 2025 Investor Day JPMorgan's CFO said that Trump's plan could upend the company's business model. "It's a very competitive business, but we wouldn't be in it if it weren't a good business for us," said Jeremy Barnum during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call. "And in a world where price controls make it no longer a good business, that would present a significant challenge." JPMorgan said on its fourth-quarter earnings call that debit and credit card sales volume rose roughly 7% year over year and described the business as central to its retail-focused offerings. Jamie Dimon JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. Alexander Tamargo/Getty Images for America Business Forum The CEO of JPMorgan also weighed in on Trump's credit card proposal. Jamie Dimon told investors on the company's fourth-quarter earnings call that reducing card interest rates could adversely affect customers with lower credit scores by limiting access to credit. "If it happened the way it was described, it would be dramatic," Dimon said. Bill Ackman PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images "This is a mistake, President," Bill Ackman, the billionaire CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, wrote on Friday on X in a now-deleted post. "Without being able to charge rates adequate enough to cover losses and to earn an adequate return on equity, credit card lenders will cancel cards for millions of consumers who will have to turn to loan sharks for credit at rates higher than and on terms inferior to what they previously paid," Ackman added. Ackman said in another post on Saturday that although Trump's goal is one that's "worthy and important," the rate cap is not the way to achieve it. "The best way to bring down rates would be to make it more competitive by making the regulatory regime more conducive to new entrants and new technologies," Ackman wrote. Anthony Noto Mike Ehrmann/TGL/TGL Golf via Getty Images The SoFi CEO believes that his business and consumers could stand to benefit from Trump's credit card rate cap. "If this is enacted — and that's a big if, though part of me hopes it is — we would likely see a significant contraction in industry credit card lending," Anthony Noto wrote in a post on X. "Credit card issuers simply won't be able to sustain profitability at a 10% rate cap." "Consumers, however, will still need access to credit. That creates a large void — one that @SoFi personal loans are well positioned to fill," Noto added. Noto also said that personal loans could be an alternative to addressing debt, though that would make underwriting discipline and borrower education "even more important." Read the original article on Business Insider

25m
3 min
0
Read Article
Politics

Tanzania: Inside Mwanza's deadly post-election crackdown

What happened in Tanzania during the unrest that followed the October election remains unclear. New evidence points to killings and grave human rights abuses by security forces in the second largest city, Mwanza.

31m
3 min
0
Read Article
Goldman Sachs breaks down what the doomsayers get wrong about the US economy in 8 charts
Economics

Goldman Sachs breaks down what the doomsayers get wrong about the US economy in 8 charts

Arturo Holmes/Getty Images In 2026 outlook, Goldman Sachs says US economic and stock market risks are overstated. The firm underscored US strength and projects continued growth. US stocks are in good shape, but Goldman warns of potential bubbles in bitcoin and generative AI. American investors are worried. They've been worried for a while now: that a recession is coming, that stock valuations are overheated, and that AI spending is the only thing keeping the economy (and markets) afloat. And if you're in the wealth management business, like Goldman Sachs, it's your job to listen to these concerns. To nod solemnly and empathize as your millionaire clients lay bare their greatest fears. And then it's your job to tell them that, actually, things aren't so bad, and despite all the apparent chaos out there, it would be quite unwise to cash out your chips in the US stock market. Goldman Sachs' wealth management unit did just that Monday, sending out a report to clients saying that the outlook for the US economy and stock market is bright — and that most of the concerns keeping investors awake at night are overblown. "Clients — and also some colleagues — are now asking whether it is time to reduce exposure to US equities in favor of other developed and emerging markets," the firm's Investment Strategy Group wrote in its 2026 outlook report. But it concludes that many of the perceived risks dominating conversations these days — from tariffs to government dysfunction to market concentration — are overstated, and that the most significant risk for equities, a US recession, is unlikely. The group puts the probability of a recession at 25%, down from last year's estimate of around 35%. Instead, Goldman's base-case projection calls for continued economic expansion and robust earnings growth for the S&P 500. "We wanted to emphasize that in spite of all the headlines that you read about 'Is America on the decline?' et cetera, we want to make a very strong stand and say, 'No, that is not the case,'" Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani, Chief Investment Officer of the Investment Strategy Group, said in a media appearance for the report's release. The US remains the preeminent destination for investors around the world, Mossavar-Rahmani said — and a "surprising" number of popular narratives miss what's actually driving growth and returns. "We want to dispel a couple of myths," Mossavar-Rahmani said. Here are some of the other takeaways from Goldman's Investment Strategy Group, and what they're telling wealthy clients to do with their money in 2026. The US is still the world's preeminent investment destination Goldman Sachs Goldman's team argues that "US preeminence" is evident across multiple measures, including economic wealth, labor productivity, deep capital markets, and natural resources — advantages they say are difficult for other major economies to match. They also point to US leadership in key innovation areas, including semiconductors, biotechnology, and AI, as well as the scale and liquidity of US equity and bond markets. The US remains a magnet for global capital, and tariffs haven't changed that Goldman Sachs Despite political turmoil and tariff uncertainty, Goldman says the US remains a magnet for global capital. "When people say, 'Oh, money's flowing out of the US.' It actually isn't. We had one month when that was the case," Mossavar-Rahmani said. That month of outflows came last April, in the aftermath of Trump's Liberation Day tariff plan announcement. Since then, foreign investors have flooded back into the US. The US economy's dependence on AI investment has been exaggerated Goldman Sachs One argument for US economic fragility is that the boom in AI-adjacent tech spending — including data centers, chips, and power infrastructure — is propping up GDP. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, which has a more dour global economic outlook, estimated the US would have been in a recession in the first half of last year if not for AI investments. A report from Deutsche Bank shows they're not alone in that sentiment. But Goldman says that view is off base, and that people underestimate how much consumption contributes to GDP. The bank's investment strategy group estimates all tech-related spending accounted for 0.5% of the 2.1% GDP growth in 2025, and Goldman's chief economist says AI capital expenditures accounted for just 0.1%. The estimate, which "includes everything related to AI, including data centers," Mossavar-Rahmani said, is "probably a little bit on the high side because they're trying to include all the power generation as well, all the utility infrastructure that has benefits elsewhere other than just AI." The Magnificent Seven aren't the only game in town Goldman Sachs This dovetails with the myth that the US stock market is dependent on AI and the Magnificent Seven stocks (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla), according to Mossavar-Rahmani. "It's just not correct that AI has driven everything in the US, including all earnings and including S&P 500 returns," Mossavar-Rahmani said. While no one disputes the incredible performance of these tech titans, Goldman contends that the rest of the S&P 500 receives short shrift and that earnings growth and returns remain respectable even after stripping out the contributions from the Magnificent Seven. "This idea that it would be a poor economy, a weak economy, no earnings, no returns is again, just another falsehood," Mossavar-Rahmani said. Valuations are high — but Goldman doesn't see a crash setup Goldman Sachs The S&P 500 hit record highs last year, and investors often worry that new highs mean a painful drop is imminent. In reality, history shows that the market usually continues to post robust gains after hitting an all-time high, Goldman notes. While Goldman acknowledges valuations are elevated, it doesn't see an overheated market reminiscent of past market bubbles. It expects the S&P 500 to continue its rise in 2026, with a base-case estimate of a 7% total return and 10% earnings growth. Goldman's "good" scenario assumes a 17% return; its "bad" scenario assumes a 15% decline in a recession. (The team assigns a higher probability to upside than downside.) Tech stocks are profit juggernauts compared with the Dot Com bubble Goldman Sachs "We do think that there are some good fundamental reasons why valuations have increased over time that are not just because of speculative excesses," said Brett Nelson, head of tactical asset allocation within Goldman's investment strategy group. In the run-up to the Dot Com bust at the turn of the century, for example, valuations and investor exuberance were divorced from earnings reality, which isn't the case today. Yes, the S&P 500 is highly concentrated, Goldman says, but today's tech companies have enormous profit margins justifying their stock valuations, not just hype. The bubble isn't in stocks — it's in bitcoin Goldman Sachs Goldman isn't worried about a bubble in US equities. Where its investment strategists do see cause for concern is bitcoin. "We do think bitcoin is a bubble," Mossavar-Rahmani said, noting that explosive price behavior in the cryptocurrency usually precedes a steep drawdown. "We are even more convinced than we were in 2021 that bitcoin has no real value, that it is a speculative and trading asset and that only questionable practices support its current price," the 2026 outlook report says. Watch out for gold and genAI companies, too Goldman Sachs Another area of concern is gold, which is at unsustainable price levels unless central banks — especially the Chinese government and households — continue to buy it to prop it up, Mossavar-Rahmani said. "We do not recommend clients use gold or bitcoin as a hedge in their portfolios," the report says. There are also "pockets of euphoria" in generative AI, with some public and private companies carrying bubble-like valuations, according to Goldman's outlook, which calls out the circular financing, easy credit, and questionable economics, coupled with soaring expectations. "Some AI company founders and CEOs of the major companies involved with AI have raised expectations to an unrealistic level about what AI will deliver in the near future in terms of both revenues for the AI companies and productivity gains for enterprises leveraging AI," the report says. Read the original article on Business Insider

32m
3 min
0
Read Article
Aventon’s newly launched Soltera ADV looks almost perfect – I’d only change one thing
Technology

Aventon’s newly launched Soltera ADV looks almost perfect – I’d only change one thing

Aventon has just pulled the wraps off the Soltera 3 ADV, and on paper, it looks like one of the cleanest, most thoughtfully designed lightweight urban e-bikes the company has released yet. Announced this week, the Soltera 3 ADV builds on Aventon’s minimalist roots with a refined single-speed setup aimed squarely at city riders who value simplicity, low maintenance, and easy handling above all else. more…

32m
3 min
0
Read Article
Indonesian comic hit with blasphemy complaints over Netflix jokes
Politics

Indonesian comic hit with blasphemy complaints over Netflix jokes

A police complaint against one of Indonesia’s best-known comedians has reignited debate over satire, blasphemy and free expression in the world’s third-largest democracy. The case involves 46-year-old stand-up comic and actor Pandji Pragiwaksono, whose Netflix special Mens Rea – an unfiltered performance touching on politics, law and democracy – was recorded in Jakarta before an audience of around 10,000 people on December 30. Pandji’s routine pokes fun at Indonesia’s political elite, taking aim...

35m
3 min
0
Read Article
Putin's Ukraine Focus Exposes Global Allies
Politics

Putin's Ukraine Focus Exposes Global Allies

A year into the Ukraine conflict, Moscow's authoritarian partners are discovering their security ties to Russia may be little more than a paper tiger, with support failing to materialize when most needed.

36m
5 min
7
Read Article
Animoca Acquires Somo as NFT Market Rebounds
Technology

Animoca Acquires Somo as NFT Market Rebounds

In a significant move for the digital assets landscape, Animoca Brands has acquired Somo, signaling renewed confidence in the NFT market as trading activity shows early signs of recovery.

40m
5 min
6
Read Article
China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela
World_news

China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela

China's JY-27A radar didn't appear to be effective during the US raid on Venezuela. US Air Force Photo Venezuela's Chinese air defense radars weren't game-changing during the US raid to capture Maduro. China has touted the effectiveness in combat of radars like its JY-27A. The lack of effect recently raises questions about both the radar and their operators. Venezuela's military had Chinese-made anti-aircraft radars available when the US launched a surprise air assault against the country to capture the country's now-former leader, Nicolás Maduro, earlier this month. They appear to have been of little help. Operation Absolute Resolve involved over 150 US military aircraft, none of which were shot down. A helicopter was hit, reportedly by machine gun fire, but remained operational. Venezuela has a number of China's JY-27A mobile radars, which Beijing has touted as top-of-the-line systems. It has said the radar can detect stealth assets, like the American F-22 and F-35, from over 150 miles away. The success of the surprise raid by US special operators into downtown Caracas, part of a larger mission which involved not only stealth airpower but also older fourth-generation aircraft and helicopters, suggests that something didn't go as planned on defense. That may be on the operators rather than the tech though. After the raid, a Japanese reporter asked a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson what Beijing thought about the "large amount of military equipment" China sold Venezuela apparently being "of little practical use." The Chinese spokesperson responded by condemning the US strike. A destroyed air defense unit at a Venezuelan military base. Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/REUTERS The Chinese-made JY-27A is a long-range radar used for detecting and tracking hostile aircraft in protected airpsace. Introduced in 2014, the radar system consists of a radar mast with multiple antenna panels supported by separate radar and control vehicles. Chinese sources claim it has features designed to reduce jamming. A newer version, the JY-27V, has since been developed. When Venezuela purchased JY-27As from China last year, there were claims that the radars were able to lock onto multiple F-35B fighter jets off the Venezuelan coast, presenting a potential challenge to the one-way transparency advantage of the US military. "That's all well and good," Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Business Insider, "but when it really matters is in a moment of conflict." Perhaps they were unable to withstand sophisticated electromagnetic spectrum attacks, or maybe they were improperly utilized by their operators. Either way, if they weren't effective, they were of little use for air defense. Radar systems are what inform air defense crews on what they'll need to target and what weapons they need to use. "If you don't have functioning radars then you're a sitting duck," he said. US military leaders said that American aircraft were able to overwhelm Venezuelan air defenses, which has been assessed to include a range of Russian-made systems like S-300VM batteries, Buk-M2 systems, and older S-125 Pechora-2M launchers, as well as the Chinese radars. Some of these pieces are capable but aren't the newest variants used by their respective exporters. In the aftermath, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked the effectiveness of the Russian air defenses. Nothing was said about the Chinese radars in that speech. Key to air defense is how the network works together, and the effectiveness of the operator is vital. In Venezuela's case, it may have been lacking the necessary conditions for successful air defense operations. Seven US troops were hurt during the raid in Venezuela over the weekend, a defense official said. US Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Isabel Tanner A study from the Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute think tank, which hosts experts on Latin America, assessed Venezuela's air defenses as being in critical condition as of last year. It said that over 60% of its radar fleet was non-operational, combat aviation doesn't fly often, and the country has received little maintenance support and spare parts from its exporters. Venezuela purchased Chinese-made radars and Russian-made surface-to-air missile batteries to modernize its air defenses, but the hardware alone can't make up for internal shortcomings. Analysis by The New York Times found that some of Venezuela's air defense equipment was in storage or not operational, leaving it unprepared for the US attack. Reports also indicated Venezuela's military lacked the spare parts and technical background to keep air defense systems running. Even if the failures are on the part of the Venezuelan military, the ineffective performance of the Russian and Chinese systems sends a "pretty big message," Sobolik said. It elevates confidence in US capabilities while raising questions about those of rivals. US officials said no American aircraft or military personnel were lost during the raid on Venezuela. Of the 150 aircraft and almost 200 American troops involved in the mission, one helicopter took fire and seven troops were injured. Read the original article on Business Insider

43m
3 min
0
Read Article
AI Resistance? The 4-Day Workweek Solution
Technology

AI Resistance? The 4-Day Workweek Solution

As companies invest millions in AI, many workers resist the technology. Authors of a new book argue that sharing efficiency gains through a shorter workweek could be the key to adoption.

46m
5 min
5
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home