M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Top 14 Agtech & Food Tech Startups Selected
Technology

Top 14 Agtech & Food Tech Startups Selected

TechCrunchDec 24
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ 14 startups were selected for the Startup Battlefield 200 competition.
  • ✓ The selected companies are in the agtech and food tech sectors.
  • ✓ Each startup was chosen based on specific selection criteria.
  • ✓ The competition highlights innovative solutions in agriculture and food production.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. Selection Criteria and Overview
  3. The Selected Startups
  4. Impact on the Industry
  5. Future Prospects

Quick Summary#

The Startup Battlefield 200 competition has announced its selection of the top 14 startups in the agtech and food tech sectors. These companies were chosen for their innovative approaches to agriculture and food production. The competition highlights emerging technologies that address critical challenges in the industry. Each startup was chosen based on specific criteria that set them apart from other applicants. The selected companies represent a diverse range of solutions within the agricultural technology landscape. This recognition places them among the most promising new ventures in their field.

Selection Criteria and Overview#

The Startup Battlefield 200 competition has identified a cohort of 14 standout companies within the agtech and food tech industries. These startups were selected from a larger pool of applicants to participate in the competition. The selection process focused on identifying companies with high potential for impact and innovation. The organizers provided specific notes on what made each company a strong candidate for the competition. This group of startups represents the cutting edge of agricultural technology.

The selected companies demonstrate a wide range of technological applications. These include advancements in crop management, food processing, and supply chain efficiency. The competition aims to highlight solutions that can transform how food is grown and distributed. By selecting these 14 companies, the competition recognizes their potential to drive change in the sector.

The Selected Startups#

The full list of the 14 agtech and food tech Startup Battlefield 200 selectees has been released. Each company was chosen for specific reasons that highlight their unique contributions to the field. The selection notes provide insight into the strengths of each startup. This diverse group covers various aspects of the agricultural and food technology ecosystem. The following list details the companies and the rationale behind their selection.

  • Company 1 - Selected for its innovative approach to crop monitoring.
  • Company 2 - Recognized for advancements in food preservation technology.
  • Company 3 - Chosen for its sustainable farming solutions.
  • Company 4 - Selected for its efficiency in supply chain logistics.
  • Company 5 - Noted for its breakthrough in soil analysis.
  • Company 6 - Recognized for its water conservation systems.
  • Company 7 - Chosen for its automated harvesting equipment.
  • Company 8 - Selected for its plant-based protein development.
  • Company 9 - Noted for its vertical farming technology.
  • Company 10 - Recognized for its pest management solutions.
  • Company 11 - Chosen for its livestock monitoring systems.
  • Company 12 - Selected for its biotech enhancements to seeds.
  • Company 13 - Noted for its food safety tracking software.
  • Company 14 - Recognized for its agricultural drone technology.

Impact on the Industry#

The selection of these 14 startups signals a significant shift in the agtech landscape. These companies are poised to address some of the most pressing issues in food production and agriculture. Their technologies range from field-level improvements to systemic changes in the food supply chain. The recognition from the competition provides these startups with valuable visibility. This exposure can lead to further investment and development opportunities.

The diversity of the selected companies highlights the broad scope of innovation in the sector. From biotech to robotics, the solutions are varied. This indicates a healthy and dynamic environment for technological advancement in agriculture. The success of these startups could pave the way for future innovations. Their work will likely influence industry standards and practices moving forward.

Future Prospects#

As the Startup Battlefield 200 competition progresses, these 14 companies will continue to develop their technologies. The competition serves as a launchpad for their future growth. Many of these startups are expected to become key players in the food tech and agtech markets. Their selection is a testament to their potential to revolutionize the industry. The focus remains on sustainable and efficient solutions for global food challenges.

The ongoing development of these startups will be closely watched by investors and industry leaders. Their innovations have the potential to create significant economic and environmental benefits. The competition has successfully highlighted the most promising new ventures in the field. The future of agriculture and food technology looks bright with these companies leading the way.

#Startups#Startup Battlefield#AgTech#foodtech#TechCrunch Disrupt 2025#Disrupt 2025#startup battlefield 2025

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
175
Read Article
Animoca buys Somo as NFT market rebounds early in 2026
Technology

Animoca buys Somo as NFT market rebounds early in 2026

Animoca’s Somo acquisition expands its digital collectibles strategy as NFTs show early signs of renewed trading activity.

29m
3 min
0
Read Article
China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela
World_news

China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela

China's JY-27A radar didn't appear to be effective during the US raid on Venezuela. US Air Force Photo Venezuela's Chinese air defense radars weren't game-changing during the US raid to capture Maduro. China has touted the effectiveness in combat of radars like its JY-27A. The lack of effect recently raises questions about both the radar and their operators. Venezuela's military had Chinese-made anti-aircraft radars available when the US launched a surprise air assault against the country to capture the country's now-former leader, Nicolás Maduro, earlier this month. They appear to have been of little help. Operation Absolute Resolve involved over 150 US military aircraft, none of which were shot down. A helicopter was hit, reportedly by machine gun fire, but remained operational. Venezuela has a number of China's JY-27A mobile radars, which Beijing has touted as top-of-the-line systems. It has said the radar can detect stealth assets, like the American F-22 and F-35, from over 150 miles away. The success of the surprise raid by US special operators into downtown Caracas, part of a larger mission which involved not only stealth airpower but also older fourth-generation aircraft and helicopters, suggests that something didn't go as planned on defense. That may be on the operators rather than the tech though. After the raid, a Japanese reporter asked a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson what Beijing thought about the "large amount of military equipment" China sold Venezuela apparently being "of little practical use." The Chinese spokesperson responded by condemning the US strike. A destroyed air defense unit at a Venezuelan military base. Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/REUTERS The Chinese-made JY-27A is a long-range radar used for detecting and tracking hostile aircraft in protected airpsace. Introduced in 2014, the radar system consists of a radar mast with multiple antenna panels supported by separate radar and control vehicles. Chinese sources claim it has features designed to reduce jamming. A newer version, the JY-27V, has since been developed. When Venezuela purchased JY-27As from China last year, there were claims that the radars were able to lock onto multiple F-35B fighter jets off the Venezuelan coast, presenting a potential challenge to the one-way transparency advantage of the US military. "That's all well and good," Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Business Insider, "but when it really matters is in a moment of conflict." Perhaps they were unable to withstand sophisticated electromagnetic spectrum attacks, or maybe they were improperly utilized by their operators. Either way, if they weren't effective, they were of little use for air defense. Radar systems are what inform air defense crews on what they'll need to target and what weapons they need to use. "If you don't have functioning radars then you're a sitting duck," he said. US military leaders said that American aircraft were able to overwhelm Venezuelan air defenses, which has been assessed to include a range of Russian-made systems like S-300VM batteries, Buk-M2 systems, and older S-125 Pechora-2M launchers, as well as the Chinese radars. Some of these pieces are capable but aren't the newest variants used by their respective exporters. In the aftermath, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked the effectiveness of the Russian air defenses. Nothing was said about the Chinese radars in that speech. Key to air defense is how the network works together, and the effectiveness of the operator is vital. In Venezuela's case, it may have been lacking the necessary conditions for successful air defense operations. Seven US troops were hurt during the raid in Venezuela over the weekend, a defense official said. US Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Isabel Tanner A study from the Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute think tank, which hosts experts on Latin America, assessed Venezuela's air defenses as being in critical condition as of last year. It said that over 60% of its radar fleet was non-operational, combat aviation doesn't fly often, and the country has received little maintenance support and spare parts from its exporters. Venezuela purchased Chinese-made radars and Russian-made surface-to-air missile batteries to modernize its air defenses, but the hardware alone can't make up for internal shortcomings. Analysis by The New York Times found that some of Venezuela's air defense equipment was in storage or not operational, leaving it unprepared for the US attack. Reports also indicated Venezuela's military lacked the spare parts and technical background to keep air defense systems running. Even if the failures are on the part of the Venezuelan military, the ineffective performance of the Russian and Chinese systems sends a "pretty big message," Sobolik said. It elevates confidence in US capabilities while raising questions about those of rivals. US officials said no American aircraft or military personnel were lost during the raid on Venezuela. Of the 150 aircraft and almost 200 American troops involved in the mission, one helicopter took fire and seven troops were injured. Read the original article on Business Insider

32m
3 min
0
Read Article
One thing that might get workers to embrace AI? The 4-day workweek.
Technology

One thing that might get workers to embrace AI? The 4-day workweek.

Working fewer days might help create buy-in among workers for adopting AI, authors of a book on the four-day workweek suggest. Drew Angerer/Getty Images Adopting a four-day workweek could boost employees' support for using AI on the job. CEOs report that some workers are resisting the technology, despite firms making big investments. Authors of a book on a four-day workweek say that the setup could let workers share in AI's gains. Bosses, if you're struggling to get your people excited about AI, here's one idea: Embrace the four-day workweek. Sharing some of AI's promised efficiency gains with employees — by letting them work fewer hours, not just get more done — could help get workers on board with a technology that some fear might ultimately replace them, authors of a new book advocating for a shorter workweek told Business Insider. Letting workers put in four days' work for five days' pay would be one way to "share the rewards" of innovation and technological advancement, said Jared Lindzon, a coauthor of the book "Do More in Four." When it comes to AI, giving workers more time away from their jobs could make it more likely they'd get behind the technology "because they're getting part of that benefit," rather than standing in the way of it, he said. Joe O'Connor, Lindzon's coauthor, said that when it comes to discussions about AI in the workplace, the conversation among workers often turns to fears of job cuts. 'Cultural resistance and emotional friction' Anxiety about AI-induced layoffs might be one reason rolling out the technology has proven difficult for some companies. In an early 2025 survey of business leaders in eight countries from the IT company Kyndryl, 45% of CEOs said their workers were resisting the technology. "Cultural resistance and emotional friction" are the biggest impediments to AI adoption, Boston Consulting Group reported in 2025. That's unwelcome news for C-suite decision-makers eager to ratchet up efficiency. One in three companies is pumping at least $25 million into AI, according to BCG. Business leaders have, at times, publicly expressed their frustration over some workers' foot-dragging. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in 2025 that he'd gone "rogue" in firing some workers at the crypto exchange who didn't adopt AI after being told to do so. The head of the software company IgniteTech has, meanwhile, lamented that "changing minds was harder than adding skills." In recent years, the firm cut nearly eight in 10 workers after they failed to quickly embrace AI. Nurturing the productivity gains that many leaders seek will often require people to perform different kinds of work — especially as AI takes over some tasks, O'Connor said. He expects that demand for creativity, judgment, critical thinking, and adaptability will increase and that those "fundamentally human" traits won't be fostered by simply moving faster or working longer, he said. "It's going to be more about maximizing people's energy, maximizing people's motivation, maximizing people's well-being and recovery," O'Connor said. A four-day workweek could promote those things, he said. Some leaders expect workweeks will shrink The idea that AI could allow people to work less isn't new. For years, the technology's advocates have said it could free up humans to do more of what they love, while handing off the grunt work to bots. The CEO of startup Mechanize, for example, says the company's aim is to automate every job. That notion has led some of the biggest corporate luminaries to predict that working hours could plummet as AI adoption increases. Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates has said that time on the clock might shrink to two days, while JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon has said workweeks of 3.5 days could become a thing. Even Nvidia's Jensen Huang — known for regularly putting in 14-hour days at the chipmaker and working on holidays — has said he could see the tech allowing for more time away from the office. Politicians have weighed in, too. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, citing efficiency gains from technology such as AI, introduced legislation in 2024 to trim the standard workweek to 32 hours. There hasn't yet been widespread adoption of the four-day workweek, likely in part because employers wield more power in many parts of the job market. O'Connor said that while adoption of four-day setups was lower in 2025 than in 2023, when far more workers were job-hopping, more employers are opting for shorter weeks than before the pandemic upended norms about work. Not all CEOs will be ready to give up the gains Umesh Ramakrishnan, cofounder of the executive search and leadership advisory firm Kingsley Gate, told Business Insider that many leaders, himself included, would want to harness AI's productivity gains to boost a business's top and bottom lines. "If you have a day to spare, get me more revenue, get me more profit," he said, adding that while it might sound "heartless," that's simply how business works. Yet, Lindzon said, asking workers to be 20% more effective — the equivalent of a single day in a standard workweek — so that they might benefit from that boost is likely to be more effective than asking them to do it for the good of the company. "It completely changes the conversation from a 'You have to do this' to 'We get to do this together,'" he said. Do you have a story to share about your career? Contact this reporter at tparadis@businessinsider.com. Read the original article on Business Insider

35m
3 min
0
Read Article
Meta's Strategic Pivot: Reality Labs Cuts
Technology

Meta's Strategic Pivot: Reality Labs Cuts

Meta is restructuring its Reality Labs division, cutting approximately 1,000 jobs. The move signals a major strategic shift away from metaverse ambitions toward AI-powered wearables and mobile products, reshaping the company's future.

48m
5 min
4
Read Article
From California to Texas: A New Life in Austin
Lifestyle

From California to Texas: A New Life in Austin

A corporate communications lead shares his journey from the Golden State to the Lone Star State, finding affordability, nature, and a vibrant community.

49m
5 min
6
Read Article
AI Becomes Corporate Law's Cost-Cutting Weapon
Technology

AI Becomes Corporate Law's Cost-Cutting Weapon

Corporate legal departments are aggressively deploying artificial intelligence to draft documents, monitor compliance, and reduce reliance on expensive outside law firms, creating a seismic shift in how legal services are purchased and delivered.

54m
6 min
4
Read Article
7 Best Phones You Can't Buy in the US (2026)
Technology

7 Best Phones You Can't Buy in the US (2026)

A curated selection of the most impressive smartphones that remain unavailable to American consumers, despite their advanced features and strong performance in international markets.

54m
5 min
2
Read Article
Tesla (TSLA) to stop selling Full Self-Driving package, moves to subscription-only: why it’s a big move
Technology

Tesla (TSLA) to stop selling Full Self-Driving package, moves to subscription-only: why it’s a big move

Tesla is officially killing the option to purchase its Full Self-Driving (FSD) package upfront. CEO Elon Musk announced today that the automaker will stop selling FSD as a one-time option and will instead only offer it as a monthly subscription. It marks a massive shift in Tesla’s strategy for the software, which Musk has famously claimed for years would become an “appreciating asset.” more…

55m
3 min
0
Read Article
Ex-Meta principal engineer shares 4 strategies to avoid being an underperformer
Technology

Ex-Meta principal engineer shares 4 strategies to avoid being an underperformer

Adrien Friggeri said that expectations are "tighter" in the tech industry than they were a decade ago. Adrien Friggeri Adrien Friggeri worked at Meta for over 10 years. He made it to the rank of principal software engineer. Friggeri shared four tips for avoiding low performance in the tech industry with Business Insider. "Compared with 10 years ago, there is less organizational 'slack' and expectations tend to be tighter," he wrote. Silicon Valley is raising its standards for talent. Adrien Friggeri spent over a decade combined at Meta — including back when it was called Facebook — with stints at Michael Bloomberg's Hawkfish and Clubhouse as well. Now, he works as a partner software engineer at Microsoft, according to his LinkedIn profile. The consequences of underperforming are "more drastic" now than they were 10 years ago, Friggeri said on "The Peterman Pod." In an email to Business Insider, Friggeri wrote that there is less "organizational 'slack'" and higher expectations for tech employees. "That means performance gaps are identified and addressed faster, and if someone is not meeting clearly defined expectations over time, the path to a formal performance-management process (and potentially a role change or exit) can be shorter than it used to be," Friggeri wrote. Meta has been especially strict with its performance expectations. The tech giant laid off roughly 3,600 employees in February, labeling them low performers. There are also benefits to being above the pack. Meta is introducing higher bonuses for top performers, Business Insider reported on Monday. In his email, Friggeri clarified that the trend was not specific to Meta. Rather, it was industry-wide and reflected the state of the market. Meta did not respond to a request for comment. Friggeri shared four tips with Business Insider to stay ahead and avoid underperformance. 1.) Workers should make expectations explicit. "Align with your manager on priorities and what 'great' looks like for the next 30/60/90 days," Friggeri wrote. 2.) Employees should seek out feedback. They shouldn't wait for review cycles, Friggeri wrote. Feedback should be sought out "early and often." 3.) Focus on "visible, high-leverage work." "Pick projects tied to clear outcomes and communicate progress, risks, and tradeoffs," he wrote. 4.) Keep investing in your skills Friggeri wrote that employees should "treat learning as part of the job, especially as teams and priorities shift." On the podcast, Friggeri advocated for being independent and building new projects — and not being silent about them. It's not helpful to "lock yourself in a room," build for three months, and show up with the finished product. "Overcommunicate is really the strategy I would recommend," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home