M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Payment Blocks Hit Self-Employed Travel Agents
Economics

Payment Blocks Hit Self-Employed Travel Agents

Travel operators have reported instances where funds were blocked when payments were routed through instant payment systems to self-employed travel agents. The issue highlights a growing tension between modern payment infrastructure and traditional business structures.

VC.ru4d ago
5 min read
📋

Quick Summary

  • 1Travel operators have reported instances of funds being blocked when payments are routed through instant payment systems to self-employed travel agents and individual entrepreneurs.
  • 2The issue specifically affects payments sent to accounts belonging to self-employed individuals and individual entrepreneurs, not to legal entities.
  • 3Travel operators who accept payments on accounts of legal entities are not affected by this problem.
  • 4The situation underscores the complex regulatory environment surrounding modern payment methods in the tourism sector.

Contents

The Payment Block IssueWho Is Affected?Implications for the IndustryLooking Ahead

Quick Summary#

The tourism industry is facing a new challenge as travel operators report instances of funds being blocked when payments are routed through instant payment systems. These blocks are specifically occurring when payments are directed to accounts belonging to self-employed travel agents and individual entrepreneurs.

This development highlights a growing tension between the adoption of modern payment infrastructure and the complex regulatory frameworks that govern business transactions. The issue is creating uncertainty for a segment of the industry that relies on flexible payment structures to operate efficiently.

The Payment Block Issue#

Reports indicate that problems arise when funds are transferred via the instant payment system to accounts held by self-employed individuals and individual entrepreneurs. These payment blocks are preventing travel operators from completing transactions smoothly, creating operational hurdles for businesses that work with independent agents.

The core of the issue lies in the destination of the funds. When payments are sent to accounts that are not registered under a formal legal entity structure, they appear to trigger certain security or compliance checks within the payment system. This results in the temporary or permanent blocking of the transaction.

The situation is particularly problematic for the tourism sector, which often operates with a mix of large tour operators and smaller, independent agents. These agents frequently use self-employed status to manage their business activities, making them vulnerable to such payment interruptions.

Key aspects of the problem include:

  • Payments routed through instant payment systems
  • Target accounts belonging to self-employed agents
  • Target accounts belonging to individual entrepreneurs
  • Resulting in blocked funds
"Tour operators who accept payments on accounts of legal entities are not affected by this problem."
— The organization addressing the matter

Who Is Affected?#

The organization addressing this matter has clarified the scope of the impact. The problem is confined to specific business structures and does not affect the entire travel industry. This distinction is crucial for understanding the risk profile of different operators.

Specifically, the issue does not affect tour operators who accept payments on accounts of legal entities. These larger corporate structures operate under a different set of banking and regulatory rules, which appear to be compatible with the instant payment system protocols.

For self-employed travel agents and individual entrepreneurs, however, the situation is different. Their status, while offering flexibility, places them in a category that is currently facing scrutiny or technical limitations within the payment infrastructure. This creates a disparity in how different business models within the same industry are treated by financial systems.

Tour operators who accept payments on accounts of legal entities are not affected by this problem.

This statement from the organization provides a clear boundary for the issue, helping businesses assess their own risk levels based on their corporate structure.

Implications for the Industry#

The emergence of these payment blocks signals a significant operational risk for a portion of the tourism sector. For self-employed agents, the inability to receive payments smoothly can disrupt cash flow, delay bookings, and damage client relationships. It forces them to seek alternative, potentially less efficient, payment methods.

For tour operators working with these agents, the blocks introduce uncertainty into their supply chain. If payments to independent agents are blocked, it could lead to delays in service confirmation and create administrative burdens as companies try to resolve the issues with payment providers and banking partners.

The situation also raises questions about the future of instant payment systems in business-to-business transactions. As these systems become more prevalent, the regulatory and technical frameworks must evolve to accommodate various business structures without creating bottlenecks. The current friction suggests that the integration of instant payments into the commercial ecosystem is still a work in progress.

Furthermore, this issue may prompt a reevaluation of how individual entrepreneurs and self-employed professionals are integrated into modern financial networks. There may be a need for clearer guidelines or technical adjustments to ensure that payments to these entities are processed as seamlessly as those to larger corporations.

Looking Ahead#

The reported payment blocks highlight a critical intersection of technology, regulation, and business practice. As the tourism industry continues to recover and grow, the efficiency of its financial operations is paramount. The current challenges faced by self-employed travel agents underscore the need for payment systems that are both secure and inclusive of diverse business models.

Stakeholders in the tourism sector will likely be watching closely to see how payment providers and regulators respond to these reports. The goal will be to find a balance that maintains the security and speed of instant payments while ensuring that legitimate business transactions are not unnecessarily hindered.

For now, operators and agents must navigate this landscape with caution, understanding which payment channels are safe and which pose a risk. The distinction between payments to legal entities and those to self-employed individuals is the key factor in determining whether a transaction will proceed smoothly or encounter a block.

Frequently Asked Questions

Travel operators have reported instances where funds were blocked when payments were sent through instant payment systems to self-employed travel agents and individual entrepreneurs. This creates operational difficulties for businesses working with independent agents.

The problem specifically affects payments to accounts belonging to self-employed individuals and individual entrepreneurs. Tour operators who accept payments on accounts of legal entities are not affected by this issue.

The issue creates uncertainty for a portion of the industry that relies on flexible payment structures. It can disrupt cash flow for self-employed agents and introduce administrative burdens for tour operators working with them.

The situation suggests that the integration of instant payment systems into business-to-business transactions is still evolving. It highlights the need for payment infrastructure to accommodate various business structures without creating bottlenecks.

Continue scrolling for more

What to expect from January's Fed meeting as Powell faces looming DOJ probe
Economics

What to expect from January's Fed meeting as Powell faces looming DOJ probe

Jerome Powell will leave his post in May. Al Drago/Getty Images Fed expected to hold interest rates steady amid stubborn inflation and disappointing jobs numbers. Powell is facing a DOJ investigation and rising political pressure from the White House. Trump is expected to pick Powell's successor soon, as the chair's term ends in May. The Federal Reserve will make its first rate decision of the year on Wednesday — and all eyes are on Chair Jerome Powell. The central bank's leaders have a near-total chance of holding rates steady this week, according to market-based projections from CME FedWatch. After three cuts in 2025, the Fed has penciled in one rate cut for the new year. In the long run, these rate decisions will affect the job market, consumer prices, and corporate America. But there's a shadow over January's Fed meeting: The Department of Justice recently launched a probe into Powell's handling of renovations to the central bank's buildings. The Trump administration alleges that the chair gave false testimony at a June Congressional appearance, though Powell said the move should "be seen in the broader context of the administration's threats and ongoing pressure" on the Fed. "This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation," he said in a video statement released January 11. Fed leaders will likely hold rates steady Fed decisions impact mortgage and credit card rates, auto loans, inflation, and labor market churn over time. A slow but not catastrophically weak job market, combined with higher-than-ideal but relatively tame inflation, will probably mean a pause in rate cuts for now. "There's little chance the Fed will vote to cut rates this week, as the data in-hand doesn't justify it," said NerdWallet's senior economist Elizabeth Renter, adding, "The Fed's monetary policy job is a balancing act and their decision to keep rates as-is indicates the risks to either side of their dual mandate are relatively equal." The central bank's dual mandate — to keep prices stable and the job market strong — has been tricky to balance lately. The US added fewer jobs than expected in December, the unemployment rate is hovering above 4%, and the inflation rate remained at 2.7%. If Fed leaders opt to hold rates steady rather than cut, it will be good news for inflation, at the risk of slowing down an already-sluggish jobs landscape. For consumers, a hold means that interest rates for homes, cars, and credit cards would largely remain unchanged. The Fed also hopes to push inflation closer to its 2% goal. For job seekers, however, still-high borrowing costs could push companies toward layoffs or hiring freezes. DOJ probe jeopardizes the search for Powell's successor The Fed has made more headlines than usual this month. Powell announced grand jury subpoenas from the Trump administration through a video message posted online. And Governor Lisa Cook's case has reached the Supreme Court, following accusations of mortgage fraud from Trump. The Powell probe has raised alarm about Fed independence with politicians, economists, and business leaders. North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis and other congressional leaders said they will now oppose all nominees to the Fed chair role from the Trump administration. With Powell's term up in May, Trump is set to choose a successor as soon as this week. Frontrunners include Trump's economic advisor Kevin Hassett, Fed Governor Christopher Waller, former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, and Chief Investment Officer of global fixed income at BlackRock Rick Rieder. The president has been vocal in his desire for lower interest rates and hopes the next Fed chair will consult with him more closely on policy decisions. "The hope is that whoever takes Powell's role next will be similarly data driven and level headed," Renter said. Read the original article on Business Insider

5h
3 min
0
Read Article
Despite the hype, AI hasn't changed work — yet
Technology

Despite the hype, AI hasn't changed work — yet

"When we asked our employees to take mandatory training for AI," says Francine Katsoudas, chief people, policy, and purpose officer as Cisco, "it actually had a bit of a negative impact." Riana Daehler Ever since the introduction of ChatGPT, companies have been eagerly anticipating the day AI will turbocharge their workers and forever transform their businesses. Three years later, they're still waiting. Why? And what's the fix? These two questions dominated pretty much every single conversation I had with executives in Davos last week — including a Business Insider roundtable I moderated with 15 chief people officers and other senior executives. One explanation that came up again and again was incomplete adoption among employees. Many professionals are understandably worried about what these tools will mean for their jobs, or at least skeptical of their usefulness as AI slop abounds. To bulldoze through this hesitation, bosses have stepped up the pressure, making AI use mandatory and incorporating it into performance reviews. But a number of executives at the roundtable advised against strong-arming. Cisco learned that the hard way. "When we asked our employees to take mandatory training for AI, not only did it not drive sustainable usage, it actually had a bit of a negative impact," said Francine Katsoudas, the company's chief people, policy, and purpose officer. What worked, she explained, was "providing choice" — like when Cisco gave its engineers access to half a dozen different AI tools, allowing them to decide which ones to use and how to use them. "They absolutely loved that," she said. Another theory was that even if employees want to use these new tools, they don't have the necessary skills to get the most out of them. Part of the fix, some argued, involves hiring people who are already good at using AI. Kyle Lutnick, the executive vice chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, said he wants to bring in more new college grads at a time when other businesses are hiring fewer of them, precisely because they have more fluency using these tools than their older counterparts. But hiring new blood won't be enough. Employers will need to do a lot more to train their existing workforces too. "Investment has been primarily on the technology and not so much on the people," said Elizabeth Faber, global chief people and purpose officer at Deloitte. "That needs to shift." A third explanation was that big productivity gains require a fundamental overhaul of the way work gets done inside companies. If the Googles or the Amazons of the world were to start from scratch today, they almost certainly wouldn't have the team structures, workflows, and job descriptions they currently do. I think that's why we're seeing the AI revolution most clearly right now in early-stage startups, which are starting from the ground up in the post-ChatGPT era. Kyle Lutnick, executive vice chairman of Cantor Fitzgerald, said he wants to bring in more new college grads because they have more fluency using AI than their older counterparts. Riana Daehler "84% of work processes have been left in their legacy state when adopting AI and have not been redesigned," Faber said. "So 16% of organizations and work processes are really being developed in an AI-native way." All of these proposed solutions are far from quick fixes. Encouraging employees to opt in voluntarily takes more time than threatening to fire them. Training staff — and actually getting them to learn — takes time too. Redesigning jobs will prove to be an even heavier lift. Many large businesses don't even know what employees do on a day-to-day basis. It's painstaking work to build out a comprehensive database of the skills employees have and the tasks they perform — and then to systematically tease out which of them can be delegated to AI and which of them can't. One chief people officer I spoke to said that it'll take years for her HR department to complete that process across every function at her company. Once all that heavy-lifting is done, what will these businesses look like? I put the question to the group at the roundtable, asking how many of them expect their workforces to shrink in three to five years' time. Two out of the 15 raised their hands — a tally I suspect would have been higher if I weren't there. One of them, Gina Vargiu-Breuer, chief people officer at SAP, explained that her company is currently keeping headcount flat because the business is still growing. "But when you're not growing, then I think this is where you have to talk about, 'OK, do we have to reduce headcount?'" she said. "I have a lot of peers in German companies where they are starting to reduce headcount dramatically. So it's a reality. For us, it's not, because we're growing, but I think it will happen going forward." Even at SAP? I asked. "At the moment we stay flat," she said. "But if productivity goes up and growth is slowing down, then I think we have to look at that with different eyes." By the end of the week, I left Davos with a sense that a workplace truly reshaped by AI — one that would allow companies to run on meaningfully smaller teams — isn't coming as soon as I'd thought. Those days seem to be still several years away, given all the painstaking work businesses need to complete to get there. That's something many economists had predicted early on, given how difficult it has always been to fully integrate new technology into the workplace. They told me that things will change less than we expect in the short term, and a lot more in the long run. No matter how fast a technology advances, humans change less readily. C-suites around the world are coming to the same realization, which is probably why I detected quite a bit of frustration in Davos. Svenja Gudell, Indeed's chief economist, compared the world's urgency around AI to the impatience of a parent potty-training their kid. "It's messy, it's a long process," she said. "You're like, 'Why is this not happening? It's been three weeks already.'" Her message to executives: "Give yourself some grace." The slower timeline is good news for the rest of us — it gives us time to learn new skills, debate new public policies, and try to shape the future we actually want. But it would be a mistake to read the so-far modest changes as evidence that tectonic shifts aren't coming. I came away from Davos convinced that when they do happen, they'll be far bigger than anything we're imagining now, for better and for worse. Aki Ito is a chief correspondent at Business Insider. // Indeed const seriesTitle = ""; // Presented by const text = "Presented by"; // 6977990fe1ba468a96aab2e2?width=1441 const sponsorLogoID = "6977990fe1ba468a96aab2e2?width=1441"; // Indeed const altText = "Indeed"; // const hubOrCatURL = ""; document.documentElement.classList.add("gi-sponsor-module"); // Selectors and styles last updated: 6-5-25 if ( document.querySelector(".gi-sponsor-module") && document.querySelector(".post-body") && !document.querySelector(".is-enhanced") ) { document.querySelector(".post-hero").insertAdjacentHTML( "afterend", ` ${seriesTitle} ${text} ` ); } if ( document.querySelector(".gi-sponsor-module") && (document.querySelector("figure.as-full-bleed") || document.querySelector(".overlay-hero-image")) && document.querySelector(".is-enhanced") ) { document.querySelector(".timestamp").insertAdjacentHTML( "beforebegin", ` ${seriesTitle} ${text} ` ); } if ( document.querySelector(".gi-sponsor-module") && document.querySelector(".breadcrumbs-wrapper") ) { document.querySelector( ".breadcrumbs-wrapper" ).innerHTML = ` ${seriesTitle} `; } Read the original article on Business Insider

5h
3 min
0
Read Article
Clawdbot is the new AI techies are buzzing about — and it's renewing interest in the Mac Mini
Technology

Clawdbot is the new AI techies are buzzing about — and it's renewing interest in the Mac Mini

A new AI agent has people buying up Mac Minis. Screenshots via @techfren, @nickvasiles, and @30float. Clawdbot is an AI agent that promises to manage your digital life, 24/7. Techies are buzzing as they hook up their calendars, text chains, and vibe-coding systems to the tech. Some AI fans are buying up Mac Minis to run Clawdbot. If your techie friend is texting a lobster, here's why. Clawdbot is an open-source AI agent that works around the clock and can connect to many common consumer apps. Users have asked their Clawdbots to organize their schedules, monitor vibe-coding sessions, and build new AI employees. It's scored some high-profile fans, from Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan to multiple Andreessen Horowitz partners. Many have praised it, others have meme'd it, and some have warned people about potential security concerns. What is Clawdbot? You can spot Clawdbot by its friendly lobster mascot. Founded by Peter Steinberger, Clawdbot is an AI agent that manages "digital life," from emails to home automation. Steinberger previously founded PSPDFKit. In a key distinction from ChatGPT and many other popular AI products, the agent is open source and runs locally on your computer. Users then connect the agent to a messaging app like WhatsApp or Telegram, where they can give it instructions via text. Clawdbot was named after the "little monster" that appears when you restart Claude Code, Steinberger said on the "Insecure Agents" podcast. He formed the tool around the question: "Why don't I have an agent that can look over my agents?" "I already did the whole startup thing," Steinberger said. "I'm just here to have fun." bro came back from retirement > built @clawdbot > solved "AI forgets everything" problem > and still gave it to us for free absolute legend 🐐 pic.twitter.com/tPwwicah42 — Karthik (@karthikponna19) January 25, 2026 Clawdbot runs locally on your computer 24/7. That's led some people to brush off their old laptops. "Installed it experimentally on my old dusty Intel MacBook Pro," one product designer wrote. "That machine finally has a purpose again." Others are buying up Mac Minis, Apple's 5"-by-5" computer, to run Clawdbot. Logan Kilpatrick, a product manager for Google DeepMind, posted: "Mac mini ordered." It could give a sales boost to Apple, some X users have pointed out — and online searches for "Mac Mini" jumped in the last 4 days in the US, per Google Trends. https://trends.google.com/explore?q=Mac%20Mini&date=today%201-m&geo=US But Steinberger said buying a new computer just to run the AI isn't necessary. "Please don't buy a Mac Mini," he wrote. "You can deploy this on Amazon's Free Tier." Engineers and AI heads seem to love it The Mac Mini buy-ups have spawned dozens of memes. One founder wrote that his "meal prep" was a fridge full of Mac Minis and Monster energy drinks. An engineer joked that his Mac Mini had quit his job and divorced his wife. Another founder prophesied a wave of Mac Mini returns in two weeks. getting a mac mini just to run clawd has got be most performative thing you can do to start the year pic.twitter.com/KwTYIEcJqI — Tommy Thomas (@0xTommyThomas) January 26, 2026 As for Clawdbot, many techies were excited by the agent's capabilities. One founder asked it to make him a dinner reservation; when it couldn't complete the task via OpenTable, it used its ElevenLabs skill to call the restaurant. "AGI is here and 99% of people have no clue," he wrote. Others were less impressed. One founder called it a "generational psyop," joking that it took him 6 texts to get a calendar invite. Clawdbot seems to be at least moderately popular. Steinberger posted on X that he had 89 GitHub pull requests — and that venture capitalists were flooding his inbox. What's the worry? Is Clawdbot the future of agents? Some onlookers seem skeptical. First, the setup process can be technical. A16z partner Olivia Moore described the process, from terminal commands to API keys. "For most consumers (or even prosumers), the learning curve is likely too steep," she wrote. Then there's the security question. You are giving an AI agent almost unlimited access to your digital life and passwords, after all. Rahul Sood, a former Microsoft exec who founded its investment arm, wrote that Clawdbot turned text messages into "attack surfaces" and had "zero guardrails by design." He advised using it carefully. Gave Clawdbot access to my portfolio. "Trade this to $1M. Don't make mistakes" 25 strategies. 3,000+ reports. 12 new algos. It scanned every X post. Charted every technical. Traded 24/7. It lost everything. But boy was it beautiful. pic.twitter.com/wYpEZ3kB67 — Kevin Xu (@kevinxu) January 26, 2026 One hacker described Clawdbot as hiring a "brilliant" butler who later opened your home to the public, allowing a stranger to read your diary. Steinberger responded to these security concerns by outlining some guardrails users could employ, including reading the security document and avoiding adding Clawdbot to group chats. How much should we hand over our digital lives to AI? A16z partner Justine Moore warned against being the "guy who automated his entire life with ClawdBot." Read the original article on Business Insider

6h
3 min
0
Read Article
Economics

Think the Paris Agreement failed? Here's what it actually achieved

Major emitter the US has officially left the Paris Agreement and global emissions keep rising a decade on from the deal. Yet renewables' growth shows climate action can work. Here's what's been done and what's missing.

7h
3 min
0
Read Article
Economics

Paris Agreement 10 years on: More wins than you may realize

Major emitter the US has officially left the Paris Agreement and global emissions keep rising a decade on from the deal. Yet renewables' growth shows climate action can work. Here's what's been done and what's missing.

7h
3 min
0
Read Article
Over 80% of every battlefield hit against Russia is now being carried out by a drone, Zelenskyy says
Politics

Over 80% of every battlefield hit against Russia is now being carried out by a drone, Zelenskyy says

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that the overwhelming majority of the drones used to strike Russian targets are now manufactured locally. YURIY DYACHYSHYN/AFP via Getty Images Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy says 80% of Ukrainian strikes are now using drones. It's one of the highest official estimates of the extent of drone involvement in the war. Zelenskyy's office said Ukraine struck 820,000 targets with drones last year. At least four out of every five successful Ukrainian strikes against Russia's forces are being carried out by drones, said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday. The new figure represents one of the highest official estimates of the involvement of drones in Ukraine's battlefield operations. In the spring of 2025, Ukrainian officials had said that roughly 70% of Russian casualties were inflicted by drones. Speaking at an awards event for Ukrainian drone units, Zelenskyy said that the "overwhelming majority" of these drones were manufactured locally. In a statement, Zelenskyy's office said that in 2025, Ukrainian troops had struck nearly 820,000 targets with drones. "Each of these strikes is recorded, which helps not only with hit verification but also with the operation of the bonus-based system for assessing military performance," the statement said, referring to a new system that rewards drone squads for video-recording their battlefield engagements. For every confirmed kill, drone units are assigned points that can be used to procure equipment. Zelenskyy said that infantry and artillery were still important in the war, but "everything is becoming extremely dependent" on how quickly Kyiv can adapt and build new technologies. "Our bonus-based electronic points system is working to scale up the results of our defense. In December, our units achieved a result of 35,000 neutralized occupiers," the Ukrainian leader said. Ukrainian units that regularly report their battlefield performance have also suggested similar tallies for December. Maj. Robert "Madyar" Brovdi, the commander of Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, said on Sunday that his units were responsible for a third of Ukraine's battlefield hits with drones, and had wounded or killed a daily average of 388 Russian soldiers in December. That roughly translates to 34,900 casualties for the month. Mykhailo Fedorov, who is now Ukraine's defense minister, previously said that he estimated up to 90% of battlefield kills in August could be attributed to drones. He was serving as minister for digital transformation at the time. Ukraine aimed last year to manufacture roughly 2.5 million first-person-view drones, though some local estimates have also said it could target a capacity of up to 4.5 million. Officials have not said how many such drones were actually produced in 2025. Kyiv has sought to aggressively expand and export its local drone manufacturing sector, and hopes to wean itself and the international market off Chinese products and parts. Read the original article on Business Insider

7h
3 min
0
Read Article
EU and India seal trade deal
Economics

EU and India seal trade deal

Pact will reduce or phase out levies on cars, alcohol and machinery while protecting some agricultural products

8h
3 min
0
Read Article
Technology

Big Tech’s AI data center push is spawning a new heat economy

AI’s energy problem may also be its solution, as cities are increasingly exploring opportunities to repurpose excess heat from data centers.

8h
3 min
0
Read Article
Society

France passes bill to ban social media use by under-15s

Article URL: https://www.rte.ie/news/europe/2026/0127/1555251-france-social-media-ban/ Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46776272 Points: 30 # Comments: 3

8h
3 min
0
Read Article
India and EU set to announce landmark trade deal
Economics

India and EU set to announce landmark trade deal

The long-awaited deal comes as both Delhi and Brussels contend with economic and geopolitical pressure from the US.

8h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home