Patrick Cohen Accuses Charles Alloncle of Malice

Patrick Cohen has taken the step of writing a formal letter to address his grievances regarding the commission of inquiry. The letter focuses heavily on the actions of Charles Alloncle, the deputy serving as the rapporteur for the inquiry. Cohen's correspondence outlines his belief that the process has been compromised by the behavior of its leadership.

The core of Cohen's complaint lies in the alleged attitude of the MP. He explicitly denounces the «malveillance» or 'malice' displayed by Alloncle. This characterization suggests that Cohen views the inquiry not as a fact-finding mission, but as a targeted effort against him or other witnesses.

In his letter, Patrick Cohen cast doubt on the value of his participation in the proceedings. He specifically questioned the «utilité» or 'utility' of his own audition. This hearing took place on December 18, marking a specific point of conflict between the journalist and the commission.

By questioning the utility of his appearance, Cohen implies that the hearing may have been performative or lacked genuine investigative intent. This sentiment reflects a broader concern among witnesses regarding the fairness and transparency of the inquiry process led by Charles Alloncle.

The accusations leveled by Patrick Cohen extend beyond procedural complaints to fundamental constitutional principles. Cohen accuses the UDR deputy of having «gravement» or 'gravely' damaged the separation of powers. This is a serious charge, suggesting that the MP has overstepped the boundaries of his legislative authority.

The allegation implies that the inquiry has encroached upon the independence of the judiciary or the executive branch. Cohen's use of the term 'gravely' underscores the severity with which he views the actions of Charles Alloncle and the potential implications for democratic institutions.

The dispute occurs within the framework of a Commission d’enquête sur l’audiovisuel public (Commission of Inquiry on Public Broadcasting). This body was established to investigate the operations and management of public broadcasting entities. The involvement of high-profile figures like Patrick Cohen highlights the sensitivity of the subject matter.

The tension between the journalist and the inquiry rapporteur Charles Alloncle suggests deep divisions regarding the scope and methodology of the investigation. As the inquiry progresses, such conflicts may influence the public perception of the commission's findings and legitimacy.