M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Nature Issues Correction on BCDX2 Complex Study
Science

Nature Issues Correction on BCDX2 Complex Study

Nature6d ago
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ Nature published an author correction on January 8, 2026.
  • ✓ The correction is for the article 'Structural insights into BCDX2 complex function in homologous recombination'.
  • ✓ The DOI for the correction is 10.1038/s41586-025-10081-3.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. Details of the Correction
  3. Scientific Context
  4. Publication Standards
  5. Accessing the Research

Quick Summary#

The scientific journal Nature released an author correction on January 8, 2026, for the paper titled "Structural insights into BCDX2 complex function in homologous recombination." The correction is accessible via the digital object identifier 10.1038/s41586-025-10081-3. This update modifies the original publication to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. The original research detailed the structural mechanisms of the BCDX2 complex within the context of homologous recombination. Author corrections are a standard procedure in academic publishing used to address errors or clarify data. This specific correction highlights the journal's commitment to maintaining rigorous standards for published research. The update ensures that readers and researchers have the most accurate information regarding the BCDX2 complex.

Details of the Correction#

Nature published the author correction online on January 8, 2026. The correction pertains specifically to the article "Structural insights into BCDX2 complex function in homologous recombination." The digital object identifier 10.1038/s41586-025-10081-3 serves as the permanent link to this correction notice. This identifier allows researchers to easily locate the updated information alongside the original paper. The publication of a correction indicates that the authors or editors identified issues in the initial manuscript that required rectification. These updates are crucial for the credibility of scientific literature. The correction process ensures that the final archived version of the paper is as accurate as possible. Readers are advised to refer to the corrected version for the most reliable data.

Scientific Context 🧬#

The study focuses on the BCDX2 complex and its role in homologous recombination. Homologous recombination is a vital biological process involved in DNA repair and genetic diversity. Understanding the structural insights of protein complexes like BCDX2 is essential for molecular biology. The original paper aimed to provide a detailed analysis of how this complex functions within these mechanisms. Corrections in this field help refine the understanding of complex cellular processes. Accurate structural data is fundamental for subsequent research and potential therapeutic applications. The scientific community relies on precise publications to build upon existing knowledge. This correction ensures that the data regarding the BCDX2 complex is reliable for future studies.

Publication Standards 📄#

Academic journals like Nature adhere to strict publication standards. An author correction is a formal mechanism used to update the scientific record. It differs from a retraction, as it addresses specific errors rather than invalidating the entire study. The process involves a review by the journal and the original authors. The date of publication for this correction is January 8, 2026. This timestamp is critical for tracking the version history of the article. The presence of a correction notice promotes transparency within the scientific community. It demonstrates a commitment to upholding the integrity of published research. These standards are vital for the dissemination of trustworthy scientific information.

Accessing the Research 📚#

Researchers and interested parties can access the correction notice through the official Nature website. The DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-10081-3 is the primary key for retrieval. This link directs users to the specific page containing the correction details. It is standard practice for journals to host both the original article and the correction notice. This ensures that the context of the changes is fully understood. Access to such documents is often behind a paywall or requires institutional login. However, the metadata regarding the correction is publicly available. The availability of this information supports the peer review process and post-publication review.

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
167
Read Article
Senate passes a bill that would let nonconsensual deepfake victims sue
Politics

Senate passes a bill that would let nonconsensual deepfake victims sue

The Senate passed a bill that could give people who've found their likeness deepfaked into sexually-explicit images without their consent a new way to fight back. The Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits Act (DEFIANCE Act), would let victims sue the individuals who created the images for civil damages. The bill passed with unanimous consent - meaning there was no roll-call vote, and no Senator objected to its passage on the floor Tuesday. It's meant to build on the work of the Take It Down Act, a law that criminalizes the distribution of nonconsensual intimate images (NCII) and requires social media platforms to promptly … Read the full story at The Verge.

5h
3 min
0
Read Article
The Best Phones to Buy in 2026: A Complete Guide
Technology

The Best Phones to Buy in 2026: A Complete Guide

A comprehensive guide to the best smartphones available in 2026, covering top picks for most users, budget options, and the latest foldable innovations.

5h
7 min
2
Read Article
Robert Pattinson’s Secret Role in ‘Marty Supreme’ Revealed by Josh Safdie
Entertainment

Robert Pattinson’s Secret Role in ‘Marty Supreme’ Revealed by Josh Safdie

It turns out Josh Safdie secretly reunited with his “Good Time” star Robert Pattinson on “Marty Supreme.” During a conversation at London’s BFI Southbank, the director revealed Pattinson had a voice role in the Timothée Chalamet ping pong drama. “No one knows this, but that voice — the commentator, the umpire — is Pattinson,” Safdie […]

5h
3 min
0
Read Article
Patrick Balkany Granted Conditional Release to Giverny Home
Politics

Patrick Balkany Granted Conditional Release to Giverny Home

The 77-year-old former mayor will serve the remaining 18 months of his sentence for financial crimes under house arrest at his home in Giverny, marking a significant development in the high-profile case.

5h
5 min
6
Read Article
Apple Debuts Playful Ad for iPhone 17's Ceramic Shield 2
Technology

Apple Debuts Playful Ad for iPhone 17's Ceramic Shield 2

A new ad from Apple Canada showcases the durability of the iPhone 17's cover glass. The spot highlights the Ceramic Shield 2 material in a unique visual presentation.

5h
5 min
6
Read Article
Automotive

Mercedes-Benz Launches First EV Charging Hubs in Canada

Mercedes-Benz has launched its first DC fast-charging stations in Canada, starting with three new sites in British Columbia, as it rolls out a broader fast-charging network around Metro Vancouver.

5h
4 min
7
Read Article
Powell sent senators details on $2.5bn Fed project following testimony
Politics

Powell sent senators details on $2.5bn Fed project following testimony

Letter seen by FT appears to undermine claims that chair of US central bank misled Congress over renovation

6h
3 min
0
Read Article
Meta has closed three VR studios as part of its metaverse cuts
Technology

Meta has closed three VR studios as part of its metaverse cuts

Several of Meta's VR studios have been affected by the company's metaverse-focused layoffs. The company has shuttered three of its VR studios, including Armature, Sanzaru and Twisted Pixel. VR fitness app Supernatural will no longer be updated with fresh content. Employees at Twisted Pixel, which released Marvel's Deadpool VR in November, and Sanzaru, known for Asgard's Wrath, posted on social media about the closures. Bloomberg reported that Armature, which brought Resident Evil 4 to Quest back in 2021 has also closed and that the popular VR fitness app Supernatural will no longer be updated with fresh content, though the current version will continue to be supported. A spokesperson for Meta confirmed the closures. "We said last month that we were shifting some of our investment from Metaverse toward Wearables," the spokesperson said in a statement to Engadget. "This is part of that effort, and we plan to reinvest the savings to support the growth of wearables this year." The cuts raise questions about Meta's commitment to supporting a VR ecosystem it has invested heavily in. The company hasn't announced any new VR headsets since the Quest 3S in 2024, and last month it "paused" planned Horizon OS headsets from Asus and Lenovo. Now, it's also pulling back on in-house game development too. Meta is claiming, internally at least, that it remains committed to supporting the industry. “These changes do not mean we are moving away from video games,” Oculus Studios director Tamara Sciamanna wrote in the memo reported by Bloomberg. "With this change we are shifting our investment to focus on our third-party developers and partners to ensure long-term sustainability.” Have a tip for Karissa? You can reach her by email, on X, Bluesky, Threads, or send a message to @karissabe.51 to chat confidentially on Signal. This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ar-vr/meta-has-closed-three-vr-studios-as-part-of-its-metaverse-cuts-202720670.html?src=rss

6h
3 min
0
Read Article
The best noise-canceling headphones to buy right now
Technology

The best noise-canceling headphones to buy right now

Whether you’re wearing them for the morning commute, while traveling, or if you’re simply trying to find some peace and quiet while working at home, noise-canceling headphones are a more essential piece of kit nowadays than ever before. And you’ve got a slew of great options to pick from; it’s hard to make a bad choice. There are longtime heavyweights like Bose and Sony to pick from. Apple has quickly carved into the market with the luxurious AirPods Max. And if you’ve got an ear that demands the best audio quality, headphones from Bowers & Wilkins and Sennheiser might appeal to you more than the mainstream contenders. Not everyone loves the feel of earbuds, and there are scenarios where over-ear and on-ear headphones are just simpler or make more sense than wireless buds — particularly if lengthy battery life matters to you. No matter how you’re using them, the criteria for picking the best noise-canceling headphones haven’t changed. The best wireless headphones for most people Sony WH-1000XM5 With improved comfort, refined sound, and even better active noise cancellation compared to the previous-gen model, Sony’s WH-1000XM5 offer a compelling mix of features for the price. Read our review. Score: 8 ProsCons Even better active noise cancellation More balanced, tighter sound Much-improved voice call quality Design is very plasticky for $400 No major new features over 1000XM4 Bulky, awkward carrying case Where to Buy: $398 at Amazon $398 at B&H Photo $398 at Best Buy Battery life: 30 hours / Multipoint: Yes / Audio codecs: LDAC, AAC, SBC / Connectors: USB-C (charging), 3.5mm headphone jack (audio) Sony’s WH-1000XM5 have a completely different design from their predecessors. The changes result in greater comfort when you wear them on your head for extended periods of time — like on a flight or at the office. Noise cancellation has been further improved from the already-stellar performance of the WH-1000XM4, putting Sony at the front of the pack compared to all major competitors. Sound quality is more detailed and balanced than the older XM4; the low end is still punchy but tighter and less boomy than before. The XM5 offer excellent voice call performance, and they can connect to two devices simultaneously, so you can stay clued in on what’s happening on your phone when you’re working away on your laptop or tablet. Sony’s headphones also include unique features like “speak to chat,” which automatically pauses your music and pipes in ambient audio whenever you start talking. Or you can hold one hand over the right ear cup to activate quick attention mode, which is convenient when grabbing a coffee or listening to airport announcements. And like other high-end headphones, the XM5 can detect when they’ve been removed from your ears for auto-pause. Last year, Sony introduced the WH-1000XM6, and while they offer incremental improvements over the XM5 in terms of sound and ANC performance, they’re also more expensive at $449.99. The XM5, meanwhile, can regularly be found for $300 or less. When you weigh price versus performance, the XM5 represent a better value overall, which is why they remain at the top of our list. Read our full WH-1000XM5 review. The best noise-canceling headphones for travel Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones Score: 8 ProsCons Exemplary comfort Top-tier noise cancellation Improved transparency mode clarity Better voice call quality than NCH700 Immersive Audio is sometimes enjoyable but often bad Immersive Audio drains battery faster No USB-C audio support Case has annoying indentations Where to Buy: $429 $279 at Amazon $429.99 $279.99 at Target $429 $279 at Best Buy Battery life: 24 hours / Multipoint: Yes / Audio codecs: aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC / Connectors: USB-C (charging), 2.5mm headphone jack (audio) Bose’s first-gen QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are basically a blend of the company’s prior Noise Canceling Headphones 700 and QuietComfort 45 that borrow the best traits from both — while throwing in a new “immersive audio” listening mode. Like past Bose cans, they’re very light and comfortable on your head, even when worn for long stretches of time. Best of all, unlike the Noise Canceling Headphones 700, these can be folded, making them easier to travel with. Their 24-hour battery life is more than adequate, and Bose has added support for the aptX Adaptive Bluetooth codec for improved audio fidelity on Android devices. The immersive audio feature works well on some songs, but less so on others. It’s worth experimenting with, but even if you leave it off entirely, you’re left with best-in-class noise cancellation, pleasing sound, and a helpful “aware” transparency mode. It’s worth noting that, in September, Bose launched the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) for $449. The newer headphones build on the original with support for lossless audio over USB-C, a slight uptick in battery life, and an improved transparency mode that’s more natural and better at boosting ANC when you encounter sudden noises. They offer a handful of other iterative improvements, but as is the case with Sony’s newer WH-1000XM6, their higher price tag keeps us from recommending them over the original model. Read our full Bose QC Ultra Headphones review. The best wireless headphones for iPhone owners AirPods Max (USB-C) Score: 8.5 ProsCons High-luxury design Terrific, balanced sound quality Very effective noise cancellation Dependable and foolproof controls Spatial audio for immersive entertainment Heavier than many competitors No 3.5mm jack Wired listening requires $35 cable Case is an abomination Lacks latest AirPods Pro features Where to Buy: $549 $449.99 at Amazon $549 $449.99 at Walmart $548.99 $449.99 at Best Buy Battery life: 20 hours / Multipoint: No / Audio codecs: AAC, SBC / Connectors: Lightning (audio and charging) There was definitely some sticker shock when Apple introduced a $549 set of noise-canceling headphones in 2020. The AirPods Max cost significantly more money than any of our other recommendations. But Apple’s build quality is on another level: these trade the plastic you’ll find in many noise-canceling headphones for steel and aluminum, and the ear cups are a breathable mesh fabric. They’re hefty headphones, there’s no denying that. But aside from Apple refusing to include a headphone cable in the box, there’s nothing about the AirPods Max that feels cheap. And I appreciate the simplicity of using the digital crown for controls, rather than relying on hit-or-miss gestures like taps and swipes. The most important part is that the AirPods Max deliver audio quality that’s up there with the best high-end Bluetooth headphones. They have an immersive, wide soundstage and fantastic dynamics, and you’ll find yourself hopping around your music library just to hear what they bring out in your favorite songs. The newer USB-C model also supports lossless audio and ultra low latency thanks to a firmware update, which, technically, isn’t something you’ll find on the last-gen Lightning model. Apple’s noise cancellation is on par with Sony and Bose, and no one does transparency mode better; at times, it can make you think you’re not wearing headphones at all. Extra features like Spatial Audio (surround sound for movies and TV shows) and automatic switching between Apple gadgets help make it a bit easier to swallow their daunting price. But the AirPods Max do have faults. The carrying case is abysmal, battery life is only average for the category, and just like regular AirPods, they’re designed with Apple’s ecosystem in mind. It gets much harder to justify dropping $550 on them if you live outside the iPhone and Mac universe. Read our original Apple AirPods Max review. The best-sounding wireless headphones Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2e ProsCons Stylish, standout design Excellent sound quality Supports wired USB-C audio No regular headphone input Doesn’t include LDAC support Your ears might get sweaty Where to Buy: $399 $269.15 at Amazon $399 at Bowers & Wilkins $399 at Crutchfield Battery life: 30 hours / Multipoint: Yes / Audio codecs: aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC / Connectors: USB-C (audio and charging) If sound quality is priority number one, then Bowers & Wilkins has you covered with the PX7 S2e headphones. They exhibit superb, detailed sound quality that some people prefer to the AirPods Max. The Bowers & Wilkins cans are true to the company’s legacy and style, with a fine-crafted design that exudes quality. And the newer “e” variant has a revamped digital signal processing that can bring out the best audio quality from streaming music. We prefer their physical buttons over the tap/swipe ear cup gestures of Sony’s WH-1000XM5. With 30 hours of battery life, they’re more than competitive with mainstream, less expensive picks. And the sound profile is delightfully warm and will bring out the most from your favorite music. The main downside of the PX7 S2e is that there’s no traditional 3.5mm or 2.5mm output for a headphone cable. You can still listen wired over USB-C, however. Read our full Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2 review. The noise-canceling headphones with the best battery life Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless Score: 7 ProsCons Much-improved comfort Better noise cancellation than before Marathon 60-hour battery life Terribly generic design No more physical button controls Headphones can power on unexpectedly Where to Buy: $449.95 $299.95 at Amazon $449.99 $299.99 at Best Buy $449.95 $299.95 at Sennheiser Battery life: 60 hours / Multipoint: Yes / Audio codecs: aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC / Connectors: USB-C (audio and charging), 2.5mm headphone jack (audio) Sixty hours. They can last for up to 60 hours on a single charge. That’s really all you need to know about the Sennheiser Momentum 4 headphones if you’re looking for an endurance champ. But they also sound terrific and prove extremely comfortable over long listening periods. This combination doesn’t come cheap, but you can routinely find them for under $300, or, in the case of Black Friday, under $200. Sennheiser’s Momentum 4 Wireless headphones edge out Bowers & Wilkins on comfort thanks to their lighter design, and the noise cancellation is slightly better. Next to the Sonys and Bose’s QC Ultra Headphones, it doesn’t get much cozier. These are headphones you can wear for multiple hours without any fatigue or pressure on your ears. Sennheiser’s sound signature is a bit more expressive with more emphasis on bass than the B&W, but the upper treble range still comes through crystal clear. Our only real nitpick with the Sennheisers is that they tend to occasionally power on inside the case and automatically connect for no apparent reason. Both the B&W and Sennheiser headphones support multipoint connectivity and a range of Bluetooth codecs, including SBC, AAC, aptX, and aptX Adaptive. Read our full Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless review. Update, January 13th: Updated to reflect current pricing / availability and several new related links. We also added a mention of the latest QC Ultra Headphones.

6h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home