M
MercyNews
Home
Back

Miracle on the Lagoon: 10-Year-Old Survives 8-Hour Ordeal

A 10-year-old boy survived 8 hours adrift on Araruama Lagoon. Read the full story of his miraculous rescue and emotional reunion.

G1 Globo20h ago
5 min read
📋

Quick Summary

  • 1A 10-year-old boy named Miguel Torquato do Nascimento was miraculously found alive after spending approximately eight hours adrift on the Araruama Lagoon in São Pedro da Aldeia.
  • 2The child had been reported missing on Sunday after strong winds and currents swept his personal kayak away from the Praia do Sudoeste.Following an extensive search involving the Brazilian Navy, Fire Department, and local volunteers, Miguel was located near Arraial do Cabo, having drifted nearly 13 kilometers from his starting point.
  • 3His father, Marcelo, confirmed the boy was medically cleared with only minor trauma from the frightening experience, expressing immense gratitude to the rescue teams and community members who aided in the search.

Contents

The IncidentThe Search OperationThe RescueA Community's ReliefLooking Ahead

Quick Summary#

A family outing turned into an eight-hour nightmare this past Sunday when 10-year-old Miguel Torquato do Nascimento was swept away by strong winds and currents on the Araruama Lagoon. The boy, who was visiting relatives in São Pedro da Aldeia, disappeared while kayaking with family members, sparking a massive search operation across the Região dos Lagos.

After hours of uncertainty and dwindling hope, Miguel was spotted by a firefighter on a jet ski near Arraial do Cabo. He had drifted approximately 12.6 kilometers from his original location. Despite the terrifying ordeal, the boy was found in good health, requiring only basic medical checks at the local pediatric emergency unit.

The Incident#

The sequence of events began during a family excursion to the Praia do Sudoeste. Miguel entered a private kayak for a recreational trip when conditions rapidly deteriorated. According to reports, the vessel was not operated by a specialized company, and there were no lifeguards present at the time of the accident.

Strong winds and powerful currents quickly pulled the young boy away from the shoreline. As night fell, the situation became increasingly dire:

  • Visibility dropped significantly as the sun set
  • Winds intensified, creating choppy waters
  • The distance from shore made vocal communication impossible

His father, Marcelo, described the harrowing conditions: “Ventava muito forte e as águas ficaram bastante agitadas” (It was blowing very strong and the waters became quite agitated).

"“Ele está praticamente bem não teve nada, não sofreu nada graças a Deus, só o susto mesmo e o trauma que foi ficar sozinho no mar sem saber como que voltava pra casa.”"
— Marcelo, Father of Miguel

The Search Operation#

As news of the disappearance spread, a massive mobilization effort took shape. The Corpo de Bombeiros (Fire Department) and the Marinha do Brasil (Brazilian Navy) deployed resources to comb the waters. Local residents, fishermen, and jet ski teams also joined the desperate search.

During the operation, a local teenager attempted to intervene but was forced to retreat after nearly drowning in the rough seas, highlighting the dangerous nature of the conditions Miguel was facing. The boy's father admitted that as hours passed, despair set in.

“Eu já não estava nem mais esperançoso pelo tempo que passou. Foram oito horas à deriva. A gente achou que o pior tivesse acontecido.”

Despite the 8-hour duration and the challenging environment, the coordinated efforts of the rescue teams kept the search active throughout the night.

The Rescue#

The breakthrough came when Miguel managed to drift close to the shoreline at Pontal da Alcaira in Arraial do Cabo. Spotting a firefighter on a jet ski, the boy gathered his strength and shouted for help, signaling his location to the rescue crew.

The reunion was emotional. Marcelo, Miguel's father, expressed overwhelming relief and gratitude. He noted that his son did not require hospitalization and was discharged after receiving routine protocol examinations at the UPA pediátrica (Pediatric Emergency Unit) in São Pedro da Aldeia.

Reflecting on the ordeal, Marcelo attributed Miguel's survival to divine intervention and the boy's resilience: “Ele está praticamente bem não teve nada, não sofreu nada graças a Deus, só o susto mesmo e o trauma que foi ficar sozinho no mar” (He is practically fine, nothing happened, he didn't suffer anything thanks to God, just the scare and the trauma of being alone at sea).

A Community's Relief#

The successful conclusion of the search was met with celebration by the family and the community. The father took a moment to publicly thank everyone involved in the operation, acknowledging the collective effort that brought Miguel home.

Marcelo stated: “Só tenho a agradecer a Deus, aos bombeiros, à Marinha, aos pescadores, moradores, velejadores, equipes de jet ski e a todos que ficaram conosco até o desfecho. Nosso Miguel está vivo.”

The incident serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictable nature of the sea, even on a lagoon, and the importance of safety protocols during water activities.

Looking Ahead#

Miguel Torquato do Nascimento is now recovering at home with his family, safe from the waters that held him captive for nearly a full day. While he faces a period of emotional recovery from the trauma of being stranded alone in the dark ocean, his physical condition remains stable.

The incident highlights the effectiveness of rapid community response and inter-agency cooperation in the Região dos Lagos. It also serves as a critical reminder for all water enthusiasts to prioritize safety, ensure proper equipment, and remain aware of changing weather conditions.

"“Só tenho a agradecer a Deus, aos bombeiros, à Marinha, aos pescadores, moradores, velejadores, equipes de jet ski e a todos que ficaram conosco até o desfecho. Nosso Miguel está vivo.”"
— Marcelo, Father of Miguel
"“Eu já não estava nem mais esperançoso pelo tempo que passou. Foram oito horas à deriva. A gente achou que o pior tivesse acontecido.”"
— Marcelo, Father of Miguel

Frequently Asked Questions

Miguel was kayaking with family when strong winds and currents swept his private kayak away from the Praia do Sudoeste. The vessel was not operated by a professional company, and there were no lifeguards present.

Miguel drifted approximately 12.6 kilometers, moving from São Pedro da Aldeia to the Pontal da Alcaira in Arraial do Cabo before being rescued.

Miguel was taken to the Pediatric Emergency Unit (UPA) for protocol checks. His father confirmed he was not hospitalized and suffered no physical injuries, only emotional trauma from the experience.

The search mobilized the Brazilian Navy, the Fire Department, local fishermen, residents, jet ski teams, and other volunteers who remained until the rescue was complete.

#G1

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
172
Read Article
Lyon Pilgrimage Agency Collapses, Stranding Travelers
Economics

Lyon Pilgrimage Agency Collapses, Stranding Travelers

A specialized pilgrimage agency in Lyon has suddenly disappeared, leaving clients with canceled trips to Mecca and no refunds. The company cites 'exceptional circumstances' as hundreds of travelers face uncertainty.

1h
5 min
0
Read Article
Cryptocurrency

JPMorgan CFO Warns of Stablecoin Yield Dangers

A top JPMorgan executive has raised alarms about the rapid growth of stablecoin yields, describing the trend as a 'dangerous and undesirable thing' that could destabilize traditional finance.

1h
5 min
1
Read Article
Saks Global Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Economics

Saks Global Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Saks Global, the parent company of iconic department stores Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, and Bergdorf Goodman, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Texas.

1h
5 min
2
Read Article
Special Schools vs. Inclusion: The Education Dilemma
Education

Special Schools vs. Inclusion: The Education Dilemma

The principle of inclusive education faces a critical test as families question whether mainstream classrooms truly serve students with disabilities. A growing conversation challenges the one-size-fits-all approach, suggesting that specialized environments may offer superior outcomes for certain learners.

2h
5 min
6
Read Article
Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship Launches in India
Sports

Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship Launches in India

The world's fastest-growing combat sport arrives in India as Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship announces its official expansion. Bollywood star Tiger Shroff joins the venture, bringing massive star power to this historic market entry.

2h
5 min
6
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

2h
5 min
6
Read Article
Read Jerome Powell's letter to senators following his testimony about renovations to the Fed building
Politics

Read Jerome Powell's letter to senators following his testimony about renovations to the Fed building

Jerome Powell, a particularly mild-mannered speaker, slammed recent attempts to intimidate his department. Li Yuanqing/Xinhua via Getty Images The DOJ is probing Jerome Powell over his congressional testimony about the Fed building renovations. Powell sent a letter, dated July 14, 2025, to senators about the renovations. The letter provided expansive detail about the Fed building's history, repairs, and budget. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell sent a letter dated July 14, 2025, to key senators on the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, following his testimony before Congress about renovations to the central bank buildings. In it, the Fed chair gave lawmakers a detailed and expansive response to inquiries about the renovations. Powell's letter to the Senate Banking Committee, obtained by Business Insider, was sent 10 days before giving President Donald Trump and other White House officials a tour of the renovation site on July 24, 2025. Powell announced via video message on January 11 that the Department of Justice served grand jury subpoenas to the Federal Reserve. He said the probe is into his June testimony about renovations at historic Fed office buildings, but warned that it was a pressure tactic over interest rates. "This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions — or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation." Rep. Anna Paulina Luna accused Powell of misleading Congress and sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department, though it's unclear whether that prompted the DOJ investigation. The letter to Sen. Tim Scott, chairman of the committee, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the ranking member, outlines the history of the Fed's Washington, DC, buildings, offers details about the repairs and working conditions, and provides information about the cost of the project's budget. The letter was first reported by the Financial Times. Powell wrote that the Federal Reserve Board "believes it is of the utmost importance to provide transparency for our decisions and to be accountable to the public through the Congress for our work." During Powell's testimony in June, Scott said the Fed's more than $2 billion renovation of its headquarters was excessive and likened it to the "Palace of Versailles." Powell responded that many features Scott mentioned no longer exist, such as beehives, a VIP elevator, and water features, but added that the Marriner S. Eccles Building urgently needed safety upgrades and hadn't been meaningfully renovated before work began in 2022. The White House and the Federal Reserve Board did not immediately respond to a request for comments. Read the full letter: Dear Chairman Scott and Ranking Member Warren: I am writing to follow up on your interest in the Federal Reserve Board's (Board) Marriner S. Eccles Building (Eccles Building) and 1951 Constitution Avenue Building project. The Board believes it is of the utmost importance to provide transparency for our decisions and to be accountable to the public through the Congress for our work. We take seriously our commitment to transparency. We respect the critical importance of the constitutionally-derived congressional oversight of our activities, and we are committed to working collaboratively and cooperatively with you. In advance of Board staff discussing the project in further detail with your staff as you have requested, I wanted to share a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the project and provide you with additional information. The FAQs address the project goals, engagement with state and federal entities, cost drivers, and various features of the project. The FAQs are enclosed and are also on our public website.1 For historical perspective, the Eccles Building was constructed between 1935 and 1937 as the headquarters for the Federal Reserve Board. The 1951 Constitution Avenue Building was constructed in 1932 for the U.S. Public Health Service. Over its history, it housed a variety of government agencies, including the Combined Chiefs of Staff during World War II, the Atomic Energy Commission, the National Science Foundation, and the Department of the Interior. Both buildings are listed in the District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites, and the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. While periodic work has been done to keep the buildings occupiable, neither building has seen a comprehensive renovation since they were constructed. For some time, significant structural repairs and other updates were needed for the Eccles Building. Similarly, the vacant and dilapidated 1951 Constitution Avenue Building, across the street from the Eccles Building, needed significant repairs and updating. Despite its condition, the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building provided an opportunity for the Board to consolidate its operations and reduce expenses over time on leased space in commercial office buildings elsewhere. In 2017, the General Services Administration (GSA) approached us about our interest in taking over the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building. In 2018, GSA transferred sole control of the 1951 Constitution Avenue Building to the Board. In a press release announcing the transfer in 2018, GSA's Public Buildings Service Commissioner stated "This transfer will put a vacant building back in productive use, allow the Federal Reserve Board to consolidate several leases and result in savings for taxpayers."2 To address the significant state of disrepair and unsafe working conditions, the Board is undertaking a complete overhaul and modernization of these two historic buildings. This includes remediation and updates to make the buildings safe, healthy, and effective places to work by removing asbestos and lead contamination and accommodating modern workplace technology. The project has also involved the complete replacement of antiquated systems that are beyond their useful life, such as electrical; plumbing; heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; and fire detection and suppression systems. As part of the project, the Board has undertaken major structural work to bring the buildings up to modern code, including current accessibility, security, and safety standards. Throughout the process, the Board chose to consult with a range of state and federal agencies including the Commission on Fine Arts, the District of Columbia's Public Space Committee and its State Historic Preservation Office, the National Park Service, and the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC). As discussed in the enclosed FAQs, although the Board is generally not subject to the jurisdiction of the NCPC, historically the Board has submitted building project designs to the NCPC and worked with the NCPC to address their feedback. In recognition of the historic nature of both buildings and their prominent location on the National Mall, the project identified key architectural features to preserve the historic integrity of the buildings, such as stonework, including marble, façades, meeting rooms, and other spaces. Historic preservation work in the Eccles Building also includes elevators that are original to the building, and historic conference rooms. Construction involving the preservation of historic spaces requires specialized processes and methods, which are generally more complex and have increased costs compared with new construction or renovation of spaces that are not historically significant or located on the National Mall. Various factors drove cost increases following the NCPC's final approval of site and building plans in 2021. These factors include differences over time between original estimates and actual costs of materials, equipment, and labor, and unforeseen conditions in the properties, such as more asbestos than anticipated, toxic contamination in the soil, and a higher-than- expected water table. As is to be expected in the major renovation of nearly 100-year-old historic buildings, the Board's designs have continued to evolve over the course of the project, and some features of the buildings, including rooftop spaces and new water features on the building grounds, were scaled back or eliminated as the project moved forward. These changes simplified the project and reduced the likelihood of further delays and cost overruns. None of them added cost to the project. We do not consider these changes to be substantial. With respect to the specific concerns that were discussed at the hearing, I would like to provide additional detail regarding various elements of the project: • The Eccles and 1951 Constitution Avenue buildings were originally built with marble in the façades and stonework. The project has salvaged the original exterior marble to be reinstalled and will use new domestic marble sourced from Georgia in places where the original was damaged or where needed to keep with historic preservation guidelines and to address concerns raised by external review agencies. • The original elevators are being rehabilitated, including an elevator that services historic conference rooms. A short (eighteen inch) extension of this rehabilitated elevator will make the space more accessible for people with disabilities. There are no elevators where access is limited to governors. There are no VIP dining rooms being constructed as part of the project. The Eccles Building has historic multi-use rooms that are used as conference rooms and for mealtime meetings, which are being renovated and preserved. • Although the Board's initial design included new water features for 1951 Constitution Avenue, they have been eliminated. Fountains that were original to the Eccles Building are being restored. • The ground-level front lawn of 1951 Constitution Avenue serves as the roof of the parking structure beneath. It was referred to as a "garden terrace" in the 2021 submission to the National Capital Planning Commission. There are other references to "vegetated roofs," often referred to as green roofs, which are commonly used to help with stormwater management and to increase building efficiency and roof longevity. Green roofs are found on other federal government buildings, like the Departments of Justice, Interior, and many others, and are encouraged by the General Services Administration.3 We take seriously the responsibility to be good stewards of public resources as we fulfill the duties given to us by Congress on behalf of the American people. We have taken great care to ensure the project is carefully overseen since it was first approved by the Board in 2017. The project has been subject to annual budget approval by the Board since then. In addition to oversight by members of the Board, our independent Inspector General (IG) has had full access to project information on costs, contracts, schedules, and expenditures and receives monthly reports on the construction program. The Board's IG conducted an audit in 2021 to assess the Board's process for planning and managing multiple renovation projects as well as procuring services under various renovation-related contracts. I have asked the Board's IG to take a fresh look at the project. I hope you find this additional information helpful. Sincerely, Jerome H Powell Read the original article on Business Insider

2h
3 min
0
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

2h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

2h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home