Gael García Bernal Calls for Transatlantic Film Alliance
Entertainment

Gael García Bernal Calls for Transatlantic Film Alliance

Mexican actor and filmmaker Gael García Bernal has issued a powerful call for Latin American and European cinema to form a united critical alliance. He argues this partnership is essential to counter the overwhelming influence of American and British productions.

Le Figaro2h ago
5 min read
📋

Quick Summary

  • 1Mexican actor and filmmaker Gael García Bernal advocates for a strategic alliance between Latin American and European cinema.
  • 2He argues this partnership is necessary to counter the hegemony of American and British productions.
  • 3Bernal criticizes these dominant industries for failing to uphold fundamental ethical principles, such as defending migrants.
  • 4His call emphasizes the need for a shared critical perspective to promote diverse and ethical storytelling.

A Call for Unity

In a significant appeal for cultural collaboration, Mexican actor and filmmaker Gael García Bernal has called for a strategic alliance between the cinemas of Latin America and Europe. His vision is one of shared critical thought, designed to create a powerful counter-narrative to the current global media landscape.

The proposal comes as a response to the overwhelming dominance of major film industries. Bernal specifically identifies the hegemony of American and English-language productions as a central challenge facing filmmakers worldwide.

The Core Argument

Bernal's vision is not merely about artistic collaboration but about forming a critical front. He believes that by uniting, Latin American and European filmmakers can present a more robust and ethically grounded alternative to mainstream offerings. This alliance would focus on producing and promoting content that challenges the status quo.

The primary critique is directed at the ethical shortcomings of dominant productions. Bernal argues that many of these large-scale American and British films and series fail to defend certain fundamental ethical principles. This lack of ethical commitment is particularly evident in their portrayal and treatment of critical social issues.

They do not defend "certain principles éthiques fondamentaux" such as "la défense du migrant."

"They do not defend "certain principles éthiques fondamentaux" such as "la défense du migrant.""
Gael García Bernal, Actor and Filmmaker

A Critique of Hegemony

The term hégémonie (hegemony) is central to Bernal's argument. It refers to the pervasive and often unquestioned dominance of one cultural or political group over others. In the film industry, this manifests as the widespread availability and influence of American and British content, which can overshadow local and diverse voices.

This dominance is not just a matter of market share; it shapes global perceptions and cultural values. Bernal's call suggests that this imbalance limits the types of stories being told and the perspectives being shared with global audiences. The proposed alliance seeks to disrupt this pattern.

Key areas of focus for this new critical perspective would include:

  • Championing diverse cultural narratives
  • Upholding strong ethical standards in storytelling
  • Providing a platform for underrepresented voices
  • Creating a sustainable alternative to mainstream production models

The Ethical Imperative

The ethical dimension of Bernal's proposal is its most compelling feature. He moves the conversation beyond simple artistic preference to a question of moral responsibility. The defense of the migrant is presented as a litmus test for the ethical integrity of a film industry.

By highlighting this specific issue, Bernal underscores the real-world impact of cinematic storytelling. He suggests that cinema has a duty to engage with pressing humanitarian concerns rather than avoiding them. This stance positions the proposed alliance as a force for social consciousness as much as for artistic innovation.

The alliance would therefore be built on a foundation of shared values, prioritizing:

  • Human dignity and rights
  • Social and political engagement
  • Authentic representation
  • Critical discourse

A Transatlantic Vision

The specific pairing of Latin America and Europe is strategic. Both continents possess rich, diverse cinematic traditions with a history of social and political commentary. By combining their resources, talent, and critical perspectives, they could create a formidable cultural bloc.

This transatlantic partnership would leverage the unique strengths of each region. Latin American cinema is known for its vibrant storytelling and raw social realism, while European cinema often excels in artistic experimentation and auteur-driven projects. Together, they could offer a compelling alternative to the homogenized output of major studios.

The vision is one of mutual enrichment and collective strength, fostering an environment where films that tackle difficult subjects can find funding, production support, and a receptive audience.

Looking Ahead

Gael García Bernal's call to action is a timely reminder of cinema's power to shape discourse and challenge power structures. His proposal for a Latin American-European alliance is a blueprint for a more equitable and ethically conscious global film industry.

The success of such an initiative would depend on the willingness of filmmakers, producers, and institutions to invest in this shared vision. It represents a long-term commitment to fostering a cinematic landscape where diverse voices and critical perspectives can thrive.

Ultimately, the alliance is about more than just film; it is about using the medium to advocate for a more just and empathetic world, starting with the defense of the most vulnerable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Gael García Bernal is calling for a strategic alliance between the film industries of Latin America and Europe. He believes this partnership would create a united critical front to counter the dominance of American and British productions.

Bernal argues that the current hegemony of Anglo-American cinema often fails to uphold fundamental ethical principles, such as defending migrants. He sees the proposed alliance as a way to promote more socially conscious and ethically grounded storytelling.

The alliance would focus on producing and promoting films that challenge the status quo, champion diverse cultural narratives, and engage with pressing humanitarian and social issues. It would be built on a foundation of shared critical perspective and ethical values.

#Cinéma

Continue scrolling for more

I tried Buffalo wings from 5 major chain restaurants and ranked them from worst to best
Lifestyle

I tried Buffalo wings from 5 major chain restaurants and ranked them from worst to best

Wingstop original hot wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider Buffalo wings are a game-day favorite, but some chains do them better than others. I compared Buffalo wings from Applebee's, Chili's, Buffalo Wild Wings, TGI Fridays, and Wingstop. Wingstop surprised me with its saucy, juicy wings. With football season in full swing and Super Bowl Sunday just around the corner, you might be wondering which chain's Buffalo chicken wings get a touchdown and which are a total miss. I tried and ranked Buffalo chicken wings from five chain restaurants — Applebee's, Chili's, Buffalo Wild Wings, TGI Fridays, and Wingstop — based on taste and value. All of the wings were slightly different, but I liked the spiciest, sauciest wings the best. Here's how the five chain restaurants' Buffalo wings ranked, from my least favorite to my most favorite. My least favorite Buffalo wings came from TGI Fridays. Erin McDowell/Business Insider I ordered an eight-count of bone-in traditional Buffalo wings at the restaurant I visited in Massachusetts. They cost $12.19, excluding taxes and fees, and came with celery sticks and sides of ranch and blue cheese. The wings were crispy but a little under-sauced. Erin McDowell/Business Insider Unlike some of the other chains I tried, TGI Fridays also doesn't appear to make its own Buffalo sauce. On the menu, it's advertised as simply Frank's Red Hot Buffalo. While I do like that brand of sauce, I could easily make the same wings at home, which made it feel less unique. I also thought they were slightly smaller than some of the other wings I tried. The meat inside was tender, but the Buffalo flavor just wasn't there for me. Erin McDowell/Business Insider Though I liked the crispy skin and texture of these chicken wings, as well as the tender meat inside, I thought they were lacking in sauce and flavor. Overall, I probably wouldn't order these again. The next stop I tried was Applebee's. Applebee's Buffalo chicken wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider At my local Applebee's in Brooklyn, an order of nine classic bone-in wings costs $14.29, excluding tax and fees. They came with celery sticks and sides of ranch and blue cheese. The wings were super crispy and the largest out of all that I tried. Applebee's Buffalo chicken wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The wings were a rich red-brown color and fried to a crisp. The wings were juicy, and the sauce had a good buttery flavor. Applebee's Buffalo chicken wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The Buffalo sauce had a nice balance between the heat and the more savory, buttery flavor, resulting in a well-rounded bite. I thought the meat inside was pretty juicy, and I loved the sheer size of these wings. However, I thought the wings could have been a touch spicier. Chili's landed squarely in the middle with its crispy Buffalo wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider At my local Chili's in New York, an eight-count of bone-in Buffalo wings cost $15.49, excluding tax and fees. They came with two dipping sauces: ranch and blue cheese. I thought these wings were flavorful and juicy. Erin McDowell/Business Insider I've tried these wings before and commented that they could have been slightly saucier and crispier. However, when I tried them this time, I didn't feel the same — they were perfectly crispy and almost dripping in sauce. The wings had a generous amount of meat inside. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The Buffalo sauce had a strong buttery flavor with just the right amount of heat. The chain is also known for its ranch dipping sauce, which I thought paired very nicely with the wings. Though the wings were smaller, I thought they packed more flavor than the ones from Applebee's and TGI Fridays. My second-favorite Buffalo wings came from Buffalo Wild Wings. Buffalo Wild Wings Buffalo wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The chain's Buffalo bone-in wings are arguably Buffalo Wild Wings' most famous menu item, so I was eager to see how they would compare to other chain restaurants' wings. I certainly wasn't disappointed. A six-count of traditional Buffalo wings cost $15.99, excluding tax and fees, and a side of ranch. The wings were small lengthwise but had a lot of meat. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The wings were crispy and had a light coating of Buffalo sauce that covered every part of the wings. There was a selection of both drumsticks and flats, but I noticed that the drums were particularly meaty. I loved the flavor of the Buffalo sauce and thought the chicken meat was moist. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The chicken meat inside the wing was moist and tender, and the crispy skin and slightly sweet, just-spicy-enough sauce added a lot of flavor. Overall, these were really solid Buffalo wings. I also thought these wings were good value for the cost and would definitely order them again. My favorite wings I tried were from Wingstop. Wingstop original hot wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider I ordered 10 classic bone-in wings for $21.19, excluding tax and fees. Wingstop doesn't offer Buffalo sauce on its menu, but it does have its Original Hot sauce, which is the chain's version of Buffalo. I ordered them with a side of ranch. While Wingstop also sells boneless wings, tenders, and chicken sandwiches, its senior director of culinary, Larry Bellah, told Business Insider that bone-in traditional wings remain the chain's most popular item. He added that the Original Hot flavor ranks among its top five sauces. The wings came drenched in the bright-red sauce but were still supremely crispy. Wingstop original hot wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The sticky sauce clung to my fingers as I ate these wings, which were the perfect size: not too big, not too small, and just the right amount of tender chicken meat. The meat was tender, and the spicy hot sauce blew me away. Wingstop original hot wings. Erin McDowell/Business Insider The sauce had a lot of levels, balancing between a strong vinegar flavor, to buttery, and topped off with a layer of spice that was slightly smoky yet not overpowering. The Wingstop wings stood out as the spiciest among all the chains I tried. However, the heat didn't overpower the flavor — instead, it enhanced it. Each element, from the crispy seasoned skin to the tangy undertones of the sauce, came through distinctly. These wings balanced bold, spicy flavor with a depth of taste, making them the best chain-restaurant Buffalo wings I tried. The chain also delivered on value. Even though the wings were the most expensive I tried, the 10-count made each wing come out to around $2.12 per wing, which was slightly cheaper than the cost per wing at Buffalo Wild Wings. Read the original article on Business Insider

28m
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home