M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Europe's Waning Influence in a Unipolar World
Politics

Europe's Waning Influence in a Unipolar World

The post-Cold War international order appears to be ending. Europe's role has shifted dramatically since the 1990s.

El País1d ago
4 min read
📋

Quick Summary

  • 1The international order established after the Cold War appears to be definitively finished.
  • 2In the 1990s, following the collapse of the block soviético, the Estados Unidos emerged as the sole superpower.
  • 3This created a unipolar world under North American dominance, which accelerated capitalist globalization and the expansion of democratic regimes.
  • 4Security concerns were largely reduced to terrorism, pushing aside the geopolitical tensions that had defined previous eras.

Contents

The Unipolar MomentGlobalization and DemocracyThe European Conundrum 🇪🇺Conclusion: A New Era?

Quick Summary#

The international order constructed following the end of the Cold War seems to have reached its conclusion. The geopolitical landscape has shifted significantly from the stability of the late 20th century.

In the 1990s, the collapse of the bloque soviético left the Estados Unidos as the world's only superpower. This unipolar moment fostered a specific global environment characterized by:

  • An acceleration of capitalist globalization
  • A spectacular expansion of democratic regimes
  • A reduction in security threats to primarily terrorism

During this period, major geopolitical tensions took a backseat. The European Union was originally designed to overcome traditional state structures within a liberal, rules-based world. However, the region has since evolved in a different direction, raising questions about its current geopolitical standing.

The Unipolar Moment#

The 1990s marked a definitive shift in global power dynamics. Following the dissolution of the bloque soviético, the geopolitical map was redrawn. The Estados Unidos stood alone at the apex of international power, creating a unipolar system.

This era was defined by the dominance of North American influence. The global landscape shifted away from the bipolar tension of the Cold War. Instead, the focus turned toward economic integration and the spread of political liberalism.

Security paradigms also underwent a transformation. The threat of nuclear annihilation between superpowers was replaced by a focus on counter-terrorism. Consequently, traditional geoestratégicas tensions were deprioritized in favor of managing non-state actors.

Globalization and Democracy 🌍#

Under the umbrella of North American hegemony, two major trends accelerated rapidly. First, capitalist globalization moved forward at an unprecedented pace. Markets opened, and international trade expanded significantly.

Second, there was a spectacular expansion of democratic governance. Nations across various continents transitioned toward democratic systems. The prevailing belief was that a liberal, rules-based order was the inevitable endpoint of history.

This period fostered a sense of optimism regarding global stability. The assumption was that economic interdependence and democratic governance would mitigate conflict. The CIA and other intelligence agencies shifted their operational focus during this time.

The European Conundrum 🇪🇺#

The European Union was conceived with a specific ambition. It sought to create a structure that would transcend the limitations of the nation-state. The goal was to operate effectively within a world governed by strict liberal rules.

However, the evolution of the bloc has not matched these initial aspirations. Instead of solidifying its role as a central pillar of the liberal order, Europe has faced challenges. The region has seemingly evolved down a different path.

This divergence has led to a narrative of impotencia europea. The continent's ability to project power and influence on the global stage has been called into question. The gap between the original vision and current reality is stark.

Conclusion: A New Era?#

The post-Cold War era is effectively over. The structures that defined the 1990s and early 2000s are fracturing. The unipolar dominance of the Estados Unidos is facing new challenges.

Europe finds itself at a crossroads. The continent must navigate a world that no longer adheres to the simple rules of the past. The impotencia referenced in current discourse suggests a need for a fundamental re-evaluation of strategy.

As the international system moves toward a new configuration, the role of Europe remains uncertain. The transition away from the post-Cold War order is ongoing, with significant implications for global security and economics.

Frequently Asked Questions

The order built after the Cold War appears to be finished. The United States emerged as the sole superpower, creating a unipolar world focused on globalization and democracy.

Europe was conceived to transcend the nation-state in a liberal world but has evolved down a different path, leading to perceptions of diminished influence.

#Opinión#Geopolítica#Política exterior#Estados Unidos#Donald Trump#Unión Europea#Europa#Guerra de Rusia en Ucrania#Rusia#Relaciones internacionales#Ultraderecha#Extrema derecha#Ideologías#Democracia#Globalización#Diplomacia

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
172
Read Article
Bitcoin Advocates Push Congress on Stablecoin Tax Rules
Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin Advocates Push Congress on Stablecoin Tax Rules

Leading cryptocurrency advocates are calling on lawmakers to broaden digital currency tax exemptions, arguing that narrow focus on stablecoins misses the mark for mainstream adoption and payment innovation.

22h
5 min
6
Read Article
Politics

Death toll from Iran's crackdown on protests jumps to at least 2,571, activists say

The figure analysts say dwarfs the death toll from any other round of protest or unrest in Iran in decades and recalls the chaos surrounding the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
Greenlanders brace for summit that could shape the Arctic's future - and their own
Politics

Greenlanders brace for summit that could shape the Arctic's future - and their own

US Vice President JD Vance will host Danish and Greenlandic foreign ministers for talks on Wednesday.

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'
Technology

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'

Ben Horowitz said investment teams should be the size of a playing five in basketball. Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED Ben Horowitz said his rule of thumb is about five people on an investing team. He said Andreessen Horowitz maintains lean teams and strong communication across verticals. AI tools are enabling startups and VCs to thrive with fewer employees. Ben Horowitz is a big fan of tiny teams. On an episode of the A16z podcast, the Andreessen Horowitz cofounder shared how his venture capital firm maintains a lean operation despite being one of the world's largest. "An investing team shouldn't be too much bigger than a basketball team," he said, referring to advice he got from famed American investor David Swensen in 2009. He added, "A basketball team is five people who start, and the reason for that is the conversation around the investments really needs to be a conversation." Horowitz cofounded the Silicon Valley VC firm with Marc Andreessen in 2009. Before A16Z, he ran enterprise software company Opsware, which Hewlett-Packard acquired. A16z has backed marquee companies including Meta, Airbnb, GitHub, and Coinbase. The VC said he always kept the basketball team size in mind but also knew that the firm had to expand to keep up with how "software was eating the world," his signature phrase. The solution was to split the firm into different investment verticals. To maintain good communication, staff attend other teams' meetings when investment themes overlap. The firm also organizes a two to three-day offsite twice a year, "with not much agenda." Horowitz said that people who join them from other firms say that A16Z has "less politics" than firms with 10 or 11 people because his firm has a culture where politicking is "disincentivized." A16z might have been early to the tiny team trend, but it's catching on fast with VCs and startups across the world. Startups are actively seeking to stay small, with many having fewer than 10 people. Founders told Business Insider that AI and vibe coding tools have boosted their productivity, allowing them to get things done with far fewer people. Less politics and bureaucracy are also big pluses, they say. "We're going to see 10-person companies with billion-dollar valuations pretty soon," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in February 2024. "In my little group chat with my tech CEO friends, there's this betting pool for the first year there is a one-person billion-dollar company, which would've been unimaginable without AI. And now will happen." Read the original article on Business Insider

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

23h
5 min
3
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.
Politics

Iran’s Leaders May Survive Protests. But Anger Will Likely Persist.

Its security forces have brutally defended the Islamic Republic, but the protests show that many Iranians consider it stagnant and ideologically hollow.

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record
Science

Scientists confirm 2025 was third-hottest year on record

2025 saw a cooling phase in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, yet heat from greenhouse gases countered that cooling enough that the year still was among the warmest.

23h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home