M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Critical Ruby Vulnerability Exposed Since 2002
Technology

Critical Ruby Vulnerability Exposed Since 2002

Hacker NewsJan 6
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ Vulnerability in Ruby has existed since 2002
  • ✓ Flaw affects the 'pack' functionality
  • ✓ SEC and NATO are monitoring the situation
  • ✓ Article published on January 6, 2026

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. Discovery of the Flaw
  3. Impact on Global Infrastructure
  4. Remediation and Future Steps

Quick Summary#

A critical vulnerability within the Ruby programming language has been identified, having existed undetected since the year 2002. This long-standing security flaw impacts the core functionality of the language, specifically within the 'pack' functionality.

The discovery has sent shockwaves through the technology sector, prompting immediate scrutiny from major regulatory bodies including the SEC and NATO. Given the extensive history of the flaw, millions of applications built on Ruby over the past two decades may be susceptible to exploitation.

Security researchers have highlighted the severity of the issue, noting that the vulnerability allows for unauthorized access and potential system compromise. The revelation underscores the challenges of maintaining security in legacy codebases and the potential risks to global infrastructure that relies on open-source technologies.

Discovery of the Flaw#

The vulnerability was uncovered in a recent security analysis of the Ruby language. The flaw has remained hidden for over two decades, dating back to 2002. This discovery indicates that a fundamental aspect of the language has been insecure for a significant portion of its existence.

Researchers focused their attention on the pack and unpack methods used in Ruby. These methods are critical for handling binary data and are widely utilized across various applications. The specific nature of the vulnerability suggests that improper handling of data formats could lead to severe security breaches.

The implications of this finding are vast. Since the flaw is embedded in the language's core, it affects a wide array of software, from web applications to system administration tools. The longevity of the bug suggests that it has likely been exploited in the wild, though specific incidents have not yet been publicly cataloged.

Impact on Global Infrastructure#

The revelation of this vulnerability has triggered alerts from high-level government and financial organizations. The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) are among the entities monitoring the situation closely. Their involvement highlights the potential for this flaw to affect critical infrastructure and financial systems.

Ruby is a foundational technology for many high-traffic websites and enterprise applications. The vulnerability exposes these systems to potential takeover or data exfiltration. Key areas of concern include:

  • Financial transaction processing systems
  • Government communication portals
  • Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software

Organizations relying on Ruby-based stacks are currently conducting emergency audits. The scope of the vulnerability means that simply patching the language might not be enough; legacy systems that cannot be immediately updated remain at high risk.

Remediation and Future Steps#

Addressing a vulnerability of this magnitude requires a coordinated effort. The Ruby core team and the wider open-source community are working to develop a patch. However, the challenge lies in deploying this fix across millions of repositories and deployed instances.

Developers are advised to review their codebases for usage of the vulnerable pack methods. While a patch is imminent, immediate mitigation strategies may involve sanitizing inputs or restricting the use of binary data handling where possible. The timeline for a complete resolution remains uncertain, as rigorous testing is required to ensure the fix does not break existing functionality.

Long-term, this event serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of software dependencies. It reinforces the need for continuous security auditing of even the most established and widely used open-source projects. The incident may lead to increased funding and support for security initiatives within the open-source community.

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
175
Read Article
Putin's Ukraine Focus Exposes Global Allies
Politics

Putin's Ukraine Focus Exposes Global Allies

A year into the Ukraine conflict, Moscow's authoritarian partners are discovering their security ties to Russia may be little more than a paper tiger, with support failing to materialize when most needed.

25m
5 min
6
Read Article
Animoca buys Somo as NFT market rebounds early in 2026
Technology

Animoca buys Somo as NFT market rebounds early in 2026

Animoca’s Somo acquisition expands its digital collectibles strategy as NFTs show early signs of renewed trading activity.

29m
3 min
0
Read Article
China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela
World_news

China's much-hyped radars appear to have been of little help when the US launched its massive air assault against Venezuela

China's JY-27A radar didn't appear to be effective during the US raid on Venezuela. US Air Force Photo Venezuela's Chinese air defense radars weren't game-changing during the US raid to capture Maduro. China has touted the effectiveness in combat of radars like its JY-27A. The lack of effect recently raises questions about both the radar and their operators. Venezuela's military had Chinese-made anti-aircraft radars available when the US launched a surprise air assault against the country to capture the country's now-former leader, Nicolás Maduro, earlier this month. They appear to have been of little help. Operation Absolute Resolve involved over 150 US military aircraft, none of which were shot down. A helicopter was hit, reportedly by machine gun fire, but remained operational. Venezuela has a number of China's JY-27A mobile radars, which Beijing has touted as top-of-the-line systems. It has said the radar can detect stealth assets, like the American F-22 and F-35, from over 150 miles away. The success of the surprise raid by US special operators into downtown Caracas, part of a larger mission which involved not only stealth airpower but also older fourth-generation aircraft and helicopters, suggests that something didn't go as planned on defense. That may be on the operators rather than the tech though. After the raid, a Japanese reporter asked a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson what Beijing thought about the "large amount of military equipment" China sold Venezuela apparently being "of little practical use." The Chinese spokesperson responded by condemning the US strike. A destroyed air defense unit at a Venezuelan military base. Leonardo Fernandez Viloria/REUTERS The Chinese-made JY-27A is a long-range radar used for detecting and tracking hostile aircraft in protected airpsace. Introduced in 2014, the radar system consists of a radar mast with multiple antenna panels supported by separate radar and control vehicles. Chinese sources claim it has features designed to reduce jamming. A newer version, the JY-27V, has since been developed. When Venezuela purchased JY-27As from China last year, there were claims that the radars were able to lock onto multiple F-35B fighter jets off the Venezuelan coast, presenting a potential challenge to the one-way transparency advantage of the US military. "That's all well and good," Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Business Insider, "but when it really matters is in a moment of conflict." Perhaps they were unable to withstand sophisticated electromagnetic spectrum attacks, or maybe they were improperly utilized by their operators. Either way, if they weren't effective, they were of little use for air defense. Radar systems are what inform air defense crews on what they'll need to target and what weapons they need to use. "If you don't have functioning radars then you're a sitting duck," he said. US military leaders said that American aircraft were able to overwhelm Venezuelan air defenses, which has been assessed to include a range of Russian-made systems like S-300VM batteries, Buk-M2 systems, and older S-125 Pechora-2M launchers, as well as the Chinese radars. Some of these pieces are capable but aren't the newest variants used by their respective exporters. In the aftermath, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth mocked the effectiveness of the Russian air defenses. Nothing was said about the Chinese radars in that speech. Key to air defense is how the network works together, and the effectiveness of the operator is vital. In Venezuela's case, it may have been lacking the necessary conditions for successful air defense operations. Seven US troops were hurt during the raid in Venezuela over the weekend, a defense official said. US Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Isabel Tanner A study from the Miami Strategic Intelligence Institute think tank, which hosts experts on Latin America, assessed Venezuela's air defenses as being in critical condition as of last year. It said that over 60% of its radar fleet was non-operational, combat aviation doesn't fly often, and the country has received little maintenance support and spare parts from its exporters. Venezuela purchased Chinese-made radars and Russian-made surface-to-air missile batteries to modernize its air defenses, but the hardware alone can't make up for internal shortcomings. Analysis by The New York Times found that some of Venezuela's air defense equipment was in storage or not operational, leaving it unprepared for the US attack. Reports also indicated Venezuela's military lacked the spare parts and technical background to keep air defense systems running. Even if the failures are on the part of the Venezuelan military, the ineffective performance of the Russian and Chinese systems sends a "pretty big message," Sobolik said. It elevates confidence in US capabilities while raising questions about those of rivals. US officials said no American aircraft or military personnel were lost during the raid on Venezuela. Of the 150 aircraft and almost 200 American troops involved in the mission, one helicopter took fire and seven troops were injured. Read the original article on Business Insider

32m
3 min
0
Read Article
One thing that might get workers to embrace AI? The 4-day workweek.
Technology

One thing that might get workers to embrace AI? The 4-day workweek.

Working fewer days might help create buy-in among workers for adopting AI, authors of a book on the four-day workweek suggest. Drew Angerer/Getty Images Adopting a four-day workweek could boost employees' support for using AI on the job. CEOs report that some workers are resisting the technology, despite firms making big investments. Authors of a book on a four-day workweek say that the setup could let workers share in AI's gains. Bosses, if you're struggling to get your people excited about AI, here's one idea: Embrace the four-day workweek. Sharing some of AI's promised efficiency gains with employees — by letting them work fewer hours, not just get more done — could help get workers on board with a technology that some fear might ultimately replace them, authors of a new book advocating for a shorter workweek told Business Insider. Letting workers put in four days' work for five days' pay would be one way to "share the rewards" of innovation and technological advancement, said Jared Lindzon, a coauthor of the book "Do More in Four." When it comes to AI, giving workers more time away from their jobs could make it more likely they'd get behind the technology "because they're getting part of that benefit," rather than standing in the way of it, he said. Joe O'Connor, Lindzon's coauthor, said that when it comes to discussions about AI in the workplace, the conversation among workers often turns to fears of job cuts. 'Cultural resistance and emotional friction' Anxiety about AI-induced layoffs might be one reason rolling out the technology has proven difficult for some companies. In an early 2025 survey of business leaders in eight countries from the IT company Kyndryl, 45% of CEOs said their workers were resisting the technology. "Cultural resistance and emotional friction" are the biggest impediments to AI adoption, Boston Consulting Group reported in 2025. That's unwelcome news for C-suite decision-makers eager to ratchet up efficiency. One in three companies is pumping at least $25 million into AI, according to BCG. Business leaders have, at times, publicly expressed their frustration over some workers' foot-dragging. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said in 2025 that he'd gone "rogue" in firing some workers at the crypto exchange who didn't adopt AI after being told to do so. The head of the software company IgniteTech has, meanwhile, lamented that "changing minds was harder than adding skills." In recent years, the firm cut nearly eight in 10 workers after they failed to quickly embrace AI. Nurturing the productivity gains that many leaders seek will often require people to perform different kinds of work — especially as AI takes over some tasks, O'Connor said. He expects that demand for creativity, judgment, critical thinking, and adaptability will increase and that those "fundamentally human" traits won't be fostered by simply moving faster or working longer, he said. "It's going to be more about maximizing people's energy, maximizing people's motivation, maximizing people's well-being and recovery," O'Connor said. A four-day workweek could promote those things, he said. Some leaders expect workweeks will shrink The idea that AI could allow people to work less isn't new. For years, the technology's advocates have said it could free up humans to do more of what they love, while handing off the grunt work to bots. The CEO of startup Mechanize, for example, says the company's aim is to automate every job. That notion has led some of the biggest corporate luminaries to predict that working hours could plummet as AI adoption increases. Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates has said that time on the clock might shrink to two days, while JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon has said workweeks of 3.5 days could become a thing. Even Nvidia's Jensen Huang — known for regularly putting in 14-hour days at the chipmaker and working on holidays — has said he could see the tech allowing for more time away from the office. Politicians have weighed in, too. Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, citing efficiency gains from technology such as AI, introduced legislation in 2024 to trim the standard workweek to 32 hours. There hasn't yet been widespread adoption of the four-day workweek, likely in part because employers wield more power in many parts of the job market. O'Connor said that while adoption of four-day setups was lower in 2025 than in 2023, when far more workers were job-hopping, more employers are opting for shorter weeks than before the pandemic upended norms about work. Not all CEOs will be ready to give up the gains Umesh Ramakrishnan, cofounder of the executive search and leadership advisory firm Kingsley Gate, told Business Insider that many leaders, himself included, would want to harness AI's productivity gains to boost a business's top and bottom lines. "If you have a day to spare, get me more revenue, get me more profit," he said, adding that while it might sound "heartless," that's simply how business works. Yet, Lindzon said, asking workers to be 20% more effective — the equivalent of a single day in a standard workweek — so that they might benefit from that boost is likely to be more effective than asking them to do it for the good of the company. "It completely changes the conversation from a 'You have to do this' to 'We get to do this together,'" he said. Do you have a story to share about your career? Contact this reporter at tparadis@businessinsider.com. Read the original article on Business Insider

35m
3 min
0
Read Article
Meta's Strategic Pivot: Reality Labs Cuts
Technology

Meta's Strategic Pivot: Reality Labs Cuts

Meta is restructuring its Reality Labs division, cutting approximately 1,000 jobs. The move signals a major strategic shift away from metaverse ambitions toward AI-powered wearables and mobile products, reshaping the company's future.

48m
5 min
4
Read Article
Greenland: Meeting set in Washington as Trump mulls taking the island
Politics

Greenland: Meeting set in Washington as Trump mulls taking the island

Talks are set to take place today between Danish and US officials over the future of Greenland, following remarks by Donald Trump suggesting the Danish territory should become part of the United States. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and his Greenlandic counterpart, Vivian Motzfeldt, are traveling to the US for meetings with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. For more on this, I’m joined by our International affairs editor, Philip Turle.

49m
3 min
0
Read Article
AI Becomes Corporate Law's Cost-Cutting Weapon
Technology

AI Becomes Corporate Law's Cost-Cutting Weapon

Corporate legal departments are aggressively deploying artificial intelligence to draft documents, monitor compliance, and reduce reliance on expensive outside law firms, creating a seismic shift in how legal services are purchased and delivered.

54m
6 min
4
Read Article
7 Best Phones You Can't Buy in the US (2026)
Technology

7 Best Phones You Can't Buy in the US (2026)

A curated selection of the most impressive smartphones that remain unavailable to American consumers, despite their advanced features and strong performance in international markets.

54m
5 min
2
Read Article
Tesla (TSLA) to stop selling Full Self-Driving package, moves to subscription-only: why it’s a big move
Technology

Tesla (TSLA) to stop selling Full Self-Driving package, moves to subscription-only: why it’s a big move

Tesla is officially killing the option to purchase its Full Self-Driving (FSD) package upfront. CEO Elon Musk announced today that the automaker will stop selling FSD as a one-time option and will instead only offer it as a monthly subscription. It marks a massive shift in Tesla’s strategy for the software, which Musk has famously claimed for years would become an “appreciating asset.” more…

55m
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home