Key Facts
- ✓ Opposition MKs were removed from the plenum during a heated session.
- ✓ The law calls for an investigation into the judicial system and the High Court.
- ✓ Yair Lapid pledged to 'not cooperate with this shameful farce.'
Quick Summary
A contentious law establishing a state commission of inquiry into the October 7 attacks has passed its preliminary reading in the Knesset. The legislation, proposed by the coalition, calls for an investigation that includes the judicial system and the High Court.
The session was marked by significant tension. Opposition MKs were removed from the plenum during the heated debate. Opposition leader Yair Lapid declared that he would 'not cooperate with this shameful farce,' highlighting the deep political divide surrounding the probe.
Knesset Session Turns Heated 🏛️
The preliminary reading of the law took place in a volatile atmosphere. The proposal to establish a state commission of inquiry has been a point of contention between the coalition and the opposition.
During the proceedings, opposition MKs were removed from the plenum. This action underscored the intensity of the disagreement regarding the formation and scope of the investigative body.
"not cooperate with this shameful farce"
— Yair Lapid
Opposition Leader's Response
Yair Lapid, the opposition leader, voiced strong objections to the law. He characterized the probe as a political maneuver rather than a genuine investigation.
Lapid stated that he would 'not cooperate with this shameful farce.' This declaration signals a refusal by the opposition to participate in the process initiated by the coalition.
Scope of the Proposed Probe
The coalition's legislation outlines specific targets for the inquiry. Beyond the events of October 7, the probe is intended to investigate the judicial system.
Specifically, the proposed law calls to investigate the High Court. This inclusion has fueled accusations that the probe is politically motivated, aiming to scrutinize the judiciary rather than solely focusing on security failures.
Political Implications
The passage of the preliminary reading sets the stage for further legislative battles. The dispute over the nature of the Oct. 7 investigation reflects broader tensions regarding the role of the judiciary in Israeli politics.
The coalition continues to push for the bill's advancement, while the opposition maintains its stance of non-cooperation. The future of the probe remains uncertain as it moves through the legislative process.
