Key Facts
- ✓ Hosts say landlord told them explicitly to leave
- ✓ Demands included removing Hebrew signs
- ✓ Rent increases were described as 'impossible to meet'
- ✓ Eviction attributed to 'clear antisemitism'
Quick Summary
The Chabad House in Kathmandu has reportedly been evicted from its location, with hosts citing 'clear antisemitism' as the driving force behind the landlord's actions. The hosts reported that the landlord explicitly told them to leave after a prolonged period of demands.
Key issues raised by the hosts included the removal of Hebrew signs and rent increases that were described as 'impossible to meet'. The situation escalated until the landlord reportedly issued a direct order for the hosts to vacate the premises.
Claims of Religious Discrimination
The hosts of the Chabad House in Kathmandu have alleged that their eviction is a result of religious discrimination. They stated that the landlord explicitly demanded they leave the property, citing a pattern of behavior that they characterize as 'clear antisemitism'.
The allegations center on specific demands made by the landlord over several months. These demands reportedly targeted the cultural and religious identity of the establishment.
- Requests to remove Hebrew signage from the building
- Implementation of rent increases deemed 'impossible to meet'
- Explicit instructions to vacate the premises
"clear antisemitism"
— Hosts of Chabad House Kathmandu
Escalation of Demands
The conflict reportedly did not happen overnight. The hosts indicated that the eviction followed months of demands from the landlord. This prolonged pressure created an untenable environment for the organization.
Specifically, the financial pressure was a major factor. The rent increases were characterized as 'impossible to meet', suggesting a strategy to force the tenants out rather than a standard business negotiation.
The Eviction Notice
According to the hosts, the landlord moved from demands to a definitive action. The landlord told them explicitly to leave. This direct instruction marked the conclusion of the dispute over the tenancy.
The hosts interpreted this explicit order as confirmation of their suspicions regarding the landlord's motives. The combination of targeting Hebrew signs and enforcing impossible financial terms led to the conclusion that the eviction was based on antisemitism.
Conclusion
The situation at the Chabad House in Kathmandu illustrates a dispute characterized by the hosts as religious persecution. By focusing on the removal of Hebrew signs and enforcing rent hikes they could not pay, the landlord effectively ended the tenancy.
The hosts maintain that the landlord's explicit demand to leave was the final step in a campaign driven by 'clear antisemitism'.
"impossible to meet"
— Hosts of Chabad House Kathmandu
"told them explicitly to leave"
— Hosts of Chabad House Kathmandu
