Walz Demands Trump Halt ICE Operations in Minnesota
Politics

Walz Demands Trump Halt ICE Operations in Minnesota

CNBC3h ago
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has publicly called on President Trump to immediately halt all ICE operations within the state's borders.
  • The governor's demand follows another shooting incident involving federal immigration agents in Minnesota, though specific details were not provided.
  • Walz characterized the situation as 'sickening' and demanded the removal of what he described as thousands of 'violent, untrained officers' from the state.
  • The statement represents a significant escalation in tensions between Minnesota state leadership and federal immigration enforcement authorities.
  • This confrontation highlights the ongoing debate over state sovereignty versus federal immigration enforcement priorities across the United States.

A State in Crisis

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has issued a direct and forceful demand to President Donald Trump, calling for the immediate cessation of all ICE operations within the state. The statement comes in the wake of another shooting incident involving federal agents, marking a significant escalation in tensions between state leadership and federal immigration enforcement.

The governor's remarks reflect growing frustration with the presence of federal agents in Minnesota communities. This development represents a critical moment in the ongoing debate over immigration policy and state sovereignty.

The Governor's Demand

Minnesota has reached a breaking point regarding federal immigration enforcement operations. Governor Walz's statement was unequivocal in its condemnation of the current situation and its call for immediate action from the White House.

Minnesota has had it. This is sickening. The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota.

The governor's language reflects deep frustration with what he characterizes as a deteriorating situation. His demand specifically targets the removal of what he describes as thousands of officers operating within the state's borders.

The statement follows another shooting incident involving ICE agents, though specific details about the incident were not provided in the governor's remarks. This latest event appears to have been the catalyst for Walz's public call to action.

"Minnesota has had it. This is sickening. The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota."

— Governor Tim Walz, Minnesota

Escalating Tensions

The confrontation between Minnesota state leadership and federal immigration authorities has been building for some time. Governor Walz's statement represents one of the most direct challenges to federal operations in the state to date.

Key aspects of this developing situation include:

  • The governor's characterization of ICE officers as 'violent' and 'untrained'
  • The specific demand for complete withdrawal of federal agents
  • The reference to 'thousands' of officers operating in Minnesota
  • The connection to recent shooting incidents involving federal agents

This conflict highlights the complex interplay between federal immigration enforcement and state-level governance. Minnesota's position represents a significant challenge to the administration's immigration policies.

Political Context

The governor's demand occurs within a broader national debate over immigration enforcement. State and local governments across the country have grappled with their role in federal immigration operations.

Minnesota's stance reflects a growing movement among certain states to limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. This position often creates friction with federal agencies and the administration's priorities.

The timing of Walz's statement, following another shooting incident, suggests a strategic escalation in the state's response to federal operations. The governor appears to be leveraging public concern about safety to bolster his position.

What Comes Next

The immediate question is how the White House will respond to Governor Walz's direct demand. The administration has consistently defended its immigration enforcement operations as necessary for national security and public safety.

Several potential outcomes could emerge from this confrontation:

  • Continued federal operations despite state objections
  • High-level discussions between state and federal officials
  • Legal challenges from either side
  • Further escalation in rhetoric and public statements

The situation remains fluid, with both sides holding firm to their positions. The governor's statement has clearly raised the stakes in this ongoing conflict.

Key Takeaways

Governor Walz's demand represents a significant moment in the relationship between Minnesota and federal immigration authorities. The governor's forceful language and specific call for complete withdrawal of ICE operations signal a hardening of the state's position.

The reference to another shooting incident adds urgency to the governor's call, though specific details about that incident were not provided. This development will likely shape the ongoing debate over immigration enforcement and state sovereignty.

Observers will be watching closely for the White House response and any potential changes to federal operations in Minnesota following this public demand.

Continue scrolling for more

Report reveals that OpenAI's GPT-5.2 model cites Grokipedia
Technology

Report reveals that OpenAI's GPT-5.2 model cites Grokipedia

OpenAI may have called GPT-5.2 its "most advanced frontier model for professional work," but tests conducted by the Guardian cast doubt on its credibility. According to the report, OpenAI's GPT-5.2 model cited Grokipedia, the online encyclopedia powered by xAI, when it came to specific, but controversial topics related to Iran or the Holocaust. As seen in the Guardian's report, ChatGPT used Grokipedia as a source for claims about the Iranian government being tied to telecommunications company MTN-Irancell and questions related to Richard Evans, a British historian who served as an expert witness during a libel trial for Holocaust denier David Irving. However, the Guardian noted ChatGPT didn't use Grokipedia when it came to a prompt asking about media bias against Donald Trump and other controversial topics. OpenAI released the GPT-5.2 model in December to better perform at professional use, like creating spreadsheets or handling complex tasks. Grokipedia preceded GPT-5.2's release, but ran into some controversy when it was seen including citations to neo-Nazi forums. A study done by US researchers also showed that the AI-generated encyclopedia cited "questionable" and "problematic" sources. In response to the Guardian report, OpenAI told the outlet that its GPT-5.2 model searches the web for a "broad range of publicly available sources and viewpoints," but applies "safety filters to reduce the risk of surfacing links associated with high-severity harms." This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/report-reveals-that-openais-gpt-52-model-cites-grokipedia-192532977.html?src=rss

49m
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home