Key Facts
- ✓ The tradition of 'The {name} programming language' posts continues a legacy from academic papers and books.
- ✓ A curated list exists specifically for posts with interesting comments, separate from 'Show HN:' submissions.
- ✓ The separate 'Show HN:' list is hosted at https://news.ycombinator.com/showlang.
- ✓ Current curated lists are frozen in time and may be updated in the future.
- ✓ The term 'new' in this context can also refer to old or revived languages.
Quick Summary
A recent discussion on Hacker News has revived interest in a long-standing community tradition: the "The {name} programming language" post format. This pattern, which echoes decades of academic and technical literature, serves as a benchmark for how programming languages are introduced to the wider developer community.
The initiative emerged from a practical need to understand how to best present new languages to the influential tech forum. By examining historical posts, the community gains insight into what makes a language announcement resonate, focusing on submissions that generate substantive technical dialogue rather than simple show-and-tell posts.
A Historical Pattern
The tradition of naming posts "The {name} programming language" is more than a convention—it is a continuation of a much older legacy. This naming scheme directly mirrors the titles found in academic papers and technical books that have documented programming language theory and practice for generations.
By adopting this format, contributors signal that their submission is part of a serious, ongoing conversation about language design and implementation. It creates a recognizable structure that helps the community quickly identify substantive technical content.
"It occurred to me that HN has a tradition of posts called 'The {name} programming language' (continuing a long earlier tradition of papers and books with such titles)."
"It occurred to me that HN has a tradition of posts called 'The {name} programming language' (continuing a long earlier tradition of papers and books with such titles)."
— Community Observer
Curating Quality Discussions
The core of this recent effort is the curation of posts based on the quality of their comments. Rather than simply listing every language announcement, the focus is on identifying threads that foster interesting and insightful technical discussions.
This approach distinguishes these posts from another popular format: "Show HN: [...] Programming Language." While valuable, these submissions are tracked separately, allowing for a clear distinction between different types of language introductions.
- Focus on posts with high-quality technical dialogue
- Separate tracking for "Show HN:" format submissions
- Preservation of a curated historical record
- Community-driven effort to maintain relevance
The Challenge of Preservation
One of the key challenges identified is that these curated lists are currently frozen in time. While they provide a valuable snapshot, they lack a mechanism for continuous updates as new languages emerge and discussions evolve.
The conversation has sparked ideas about how to solve this problem. The community is exploring methods to dynamically update these lists, ensuring they remain a living resource for anyone interested in the history and development of programming languages on the platform.
The 'New' in New Languages
The discussion also acknowledged a nuanced point about what constitutes a "new" programming language. The term is often used loosely to include revivals of older languages or new implementations of existing concepts.
This flexibility is important because it allows the community to appreciate innovation in many forms, whether it is a completely novel paradigm or a fresh take on a proven design. It reinforces the idea that the goal is to foster interesting technical conversation, regardless of the language's origin story.
Looking Ahead
The recent documentation of the "The {name} programming language" tradition highlights the self-organizing nature of the Hacker News community. It demonstrates a commitment not just to discovering new technology, but to preserving the context and conversations that surround it.
As the community works toward solutions for keeping these lists updated, this effort serves as a valuable case study in digital curation. It underscores the importance of maintaining accessible archives of technical knowledge for future generations of developers and language designers.
"Maybe we can figure out how to update them."
— Community Observer




