M
MercyNews
Home
Back
Instagram Head Declares Polished Aesthetic Dead
Technology

Instagram Head Declares Polished Aesthetic Dead

Business InsiderJan 1
3 min read
📋

Key Facts

  • ✓ Instagram head Adam Mosseri declared the platform's polished aesthetic dead in a Threads post.
  • ✓ Mosseri attributes the shift to the rise of AI-generated content, which he says makes curated feeds 'boring to consume.'
  • ✓ He proposed that camera companies could cryptographically sign photos to prove they are real.
  • ✓ Instagram has previously rolled out an AI studio allowing users to create custom chatbots.

In This Article

  1. Quick Summary
  2. The End of the Curated Feed
  3. The Rise of AI and 'Synthetic Everything'
  4. The Challenge of Verification
  5. Potential Solutions

Quick Summary#

Instagram head Adam Mosseri has announced that the platform's iconic polished aesthetic is dead, attributing the shift to the proliferation of AI-generated content. In a message posted to Threads, Mosseri stated that the ease of creating AI imagery has rendered curated feeds obsolete.

The executive argues that the social media landscape is shifting toward a more raw aesthetic as users seek authenticity over professional polish. Mosseri outlined the challenges this presents for the platform and proposed potential solutions to distinguish human content from AI-generated media.

The End of the Curated Feed#

Instagram's carefully curated grid is officially a thing of the past, according to Adam Mosseri. The Meta executive explained that the visual style which originally popularized the app—characterized by high-contrast photography, skin smoothing, and beautiful landscapes—is no longer the dominant mode of sharing.

Mosseri noted that this shift is driven by changing user behavior. He observed that users largely stopped sharing personal moments in the main feed years ago. Instead, personal updates are now frequently shared through direct messages using unpolished images.

He described these candid shots as "shoe shots and unflattering candids." Mosseri wrote, "Unless you're under 25 and use Instagram, you probably think of the app as a feed of square photos. The aesthetic is polished: lots of make up, skin smoothing, high contrast photography, beautiful landscapes. That feed is dead."

"That feed is dead. People largely stopped sharing personal moments to feed years ago."

— Adam Mosseri, Instagram Head

The Rise of AI and 'Synthetic Everything'#

The primary catalyst for this aesthetic death is the rise of artificial intelligence. Adam Mosseri stated that the growing ubiquity of AI images means creators must shy away from professional-style photography in favor of authenticity. He argued that "flattering imagery is cheap to produce and boring to consume," noting that social media feeds are beginning to fill up with "synthetic everything."

Tools like Midjourney and Sora have made it easy to produce high-quality images and videos of almost anything. This flood of AI-generated content creates a new reality where the vast majority of media seen online may not be an accurate capture of real life.

Mosseri emphasized that Meta is actively integrating AI tools into its own platforms, including Instagram and Facebook. The platform recently rolled out an AI studio allowing users to create custom chatbots and has experimented with AI influencers based on real celebrities.

The Challenge of Verification#

As AI technology improves, Instagram faces a significant hurdle in identifying synthetic media. Mosseri admitted that social platforms will get worse at distinguishing AI-generated content from real photos over time. This difficulty necessitates a fundamental change in how the platform operates and how users consume content.

The executive highlighted a loss of trust in digital media. He wrote, "For most of my life I could safely assume that the vast majority of photographs or videos that I see are largely accurate captures of moments that happened in real life. This is clearly no longer the case."

To combat this, Mosseri suggested a multi-pronged approach to restore transparency:

  • Clear labeling of AI-generated content
  • Greater transparency regarding who is posting on the platform
  • Better creative controls to help human users compete with AI

Potential Solutions 🤖#

While the problem is complex, Adam Mosseri offered a potential technical solution to verify the authenticity of photos. He suggested that camera companies could cryptographically sign photos at the moment they are taken. This digital signature would serve as proof that the image is a real capture of a moment.

However, until such technology is widely adopted, the responsibility falls on the platform to evolve. Mosseri believes that Instagram must adapt to a landscape where human creators are competing with content made entirely by AI. The push toward a "raw aesthetic" is not just a stylistic choice, but a necessary evolution to maintain relevance and trust in the age of synthetic media.

"Flattering imagery is cheap to produce and boring to consume. People want content that feels real."

— Adam Mosseri, Instagram Head

"For most of my life I could safely assume that the vast majority of photographs or videos that I see are largely accurate captures of moments that happened in real life. This is clearly no longer the case."

— Adam Mosseri, Instagram Head

Continue scrolling for more

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs
Technology

AI Transforms Mathematical Research and Proofs

Artificial intelligence is shifting from a promise to a reality in mathematics. Machine learning models are now generating original theorems, forcing a reevaluation of research and teaching methods.

Just now
4 min
172
Read Article
Special Schools vs. Inclusion: The Education Dilemma
Education

Special Schools vs. Inclusion: The Education Dilemma

The principle of inclusive education faces a critical test as families question whether mainstream classrooms truly serve students with disabilities. A growing conversation challenges the one-size-fits-all approach, suggesting that specialized environments may offer superior outcomes for certain learners.

1h
5 min
0
Read Article
Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship Launches in India
Sports

Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship Launches in India

The world's fastest-growing combat sport arrives in India as Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship announces its official expansion. Bollywood star Tiger Shroff joins the venture, bringing massive star power to this historic market entry.

1h
5 min
0
Read Article
Sébastien Lecornu's High-Risk Constitutional Dilemma
Politics

Sébastien Lecornu's High-Risk Constitutional Dilemma

With the national budget hanging in the balance, Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu confronts a pivotal decision that could define his government's legitimacy and future legislative success.

1h
5 min
6
Read Article
Politics

Death toll from Iran's crackdown on protests jumps to at least 2,571, activists say

The figure analysts say dwarfs the death toll from any other round of protest or unrest in Iran in decades and recalls the chaos surrounding the country’s 1979 Islamic Revolution.

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'
Technology

Ben Horowitz says that investing teams shouldn't be 'too much bigger than basketball teams'

Ben Horowitz said investment teams should be the size of a playing five in basketball. Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED Ben Horowitz said his rule of thumb is about five people on an investing team. He said Andreessen Horowitz maintains lean teams and strong communication across verticals. AI tools are enabling startups and VCs to thrive with fewer employees. Ben Horowitz is a big fan of tiny teams. On an episode of the A16z podcast, the Andreessen Horowitz cofounder shared how his venture capital firm maintains a lean operation despite being one of the world's largest. "An investing team shouldn't be too much bigger than a basketball team," he said, referring to advice he got from famed American investor David Swensen in 2009. He added, "A basketball team is five people who start, and the reason for that is the conversation around the investments really needs to be a conversation." Horowitz cofounded the Silicon Valley VC firm with Marc Andreessen in 2009. Before A16Z, he ran enterprise software company Opsware, which Hewlett-Packard acquired. A16z has backed marquee companies including Meta, Airbnb, GitHub, and Coinbase. The VC said he always kept the basketball team size in mind but also knew that the firm had to expand to keep up with how "software was eating the world," his signature phrase. The solution was to split the firm into different investment verticals. To maintain good communication, staff attend other teams' meetings when investment themes overlap. The firm also organizes a two to three-day offsite twice a year, "with not much agenda." Horowitz said that people who join them from other firms say that A16Z has "less politics" than firms with 10 or 11 people because his firm has a culture where politicking is "disincentivized." A16z might have been early to the tiny team trend, but it's catching on fast with VCs and startups across the world. Startups are actively seeking to stay small, with many having fewer than 10 people. Founders told Business Insider that AI and vibe coding tools have boosted their productivity, allowing them to get things done with far fewer people. Less politics and bureaucracy are also big pluses, they say. "We're going to see 10-person companies with billion-dollar valuations pretty soon," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said in February 2024. "In my little group chat with my tech CEO friends, there's this betting pool for the first year there is a one-person billion-dollar company, which would've been unimaginable without AI. And now will happen." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine
World_news

Tempest: American Missile Buggy Scores 20+ Kills in Ukraine

A new American off-road buggy equipped with guided missiles has entered service in Ukraine, where crews report significant success against Russian drone threats. The Tempest system offers mobile air defense against Shahed loitering munitions.

1h
5 min
4
Read Article
Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work
Entertainment

Jennifer Lawrence says a 15-minute compromise helps her and her husband make their differences work

Jennifer Lawrence Christopher Polk/2026GG/Penske Media via Getty Images Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says she married someone who is the "opposite" of her. While he is good at sticking to a schedule, it's something she finds challenging, she said. "But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," Lawrence said. Jennifer Lawrence, 35, says one small compromise helps balance her free-spirited personality with her husband's love of structure. "I married somebody who is the opposite of me. He is so organized," Lawrence said during an appearance on Tuesday's episode of the "Smartless" podcast. "He's an anchor. Everything is ordered, like on the sink. Like I have to, you know, like keep the closet doors closed, and I have like my little jobs that I work really hard to do," she said. When asked which of her habits frustrates her husband the most, Lawrence said it was her struggle with timing. "The schedule. So, our kids. I mean, I get it now. I get it. But like they're on a very strict schedule, you know? It's like breakfast, 7:30," the "Hunger Games" actor said. While her husband is good at sticking to a schedule, especially when it comes to their kids, it's something she finds challenging, Lawrence said. "He's good at keeping it. But we've learned, to keep our marriage alive, I have a 15-minute wiggle room," she said. Lawrence has two sons with her husband, Cooke Maroney, whom she married in 2019. This is not the first time that she has talked about her family life. Speaking with Cameron Diaz for Interview magazine in 2021, Lawrence said becoming a mother has made her more selective when it comes to choosing her projects. "There's no squeezing when you have a baby. There's just home, and it's the best. It definitely helps weed out projects: 'Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Is this worth being away from my child for half the day?'" she said. Lawrence also credited her husband with making things easier for her as a working mother. "Yeah, and fortunately, my husband is the greatest father in the entire world, so when I'm working, I don't have any more guilt than the usual every day, all-day parent guilt," she said. Lawrence also told Vanity Fair in 2021 that one of her favorite activities is going to the grocery store with her husband. "I don't know why but it fills me with a lot of joy. I think maybe because it's almost a metaphor for marriage. 'Okay, we've got this list. These are the things we need. Let's work together and get this done.'" Lawrence said. Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands
Economics

Creator income inequality is rising as top influencers rake in big paydays from brands

Top creator Jimmy Donaldson, a.k.a. MrBeast, at the "Beast Games" season 2 premiere. JC Olivera/Variety via Getty Images Creator income inequality is rising, with the top 1% earning 21% of brand spending, per new CreatorIQ data. The trend has continued in each of the last two years. Big brands often favor top creators, making it harder for smaller influencers to compete. Creators are raking in the ad dollars — but the wealth is being shared less and less equally. New data from the influencer-marketing platform CreatorIQ shows that the income gap in the creator economy is widening. The top 10% of creators on CreatorIQ's platform received 62% of ad payments in 2025, up from 53% in 2023. Similarly, the top 1% received 21% of the total ad payment volume, up from 15% in 2023. CreatorIQ, which included the 2025 data in a new report released on Wednesday, examined 65,000 payments over a three-year period from brands and agencies to creators who received flat payments through its software. The data reflects an overall pattern in the creator economy. Brands are shifting more of their marketing dollars to creators, with payments more than doubling over the last two years in CreatorIQ's dataset. Overall, US advertiser spending on creators was expected to hit $37 billion in 2025, according to a November report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau. At the same time, much of the ad money is going to a relatively narrow segment of top talent. While many creators also make money outside influencer marketing — such as from subscriptions or direct payments from platforms like YouTube — brand sponsorships are generally the industry's top revenue source. Jasmine Enberg, cofounder and co-CEO of Scalable, a new media company focused on the creator economy, said the numbers show the industry is starting to resemble traditional entertainment, where top players rake in substantial sums, leaving smaller ones to compete for the leftovers. Enberg said the divide would only grow as big creators get larger projects, such as TV campaigns or Netflix deals. "We need to empower brands to diversify their investment more confidently," Brit Starr, CMO of CreatorIQ, said of the industry. CreatorIQ's survey of 300 creators found that only 11% earned $100,000 or more. About one-quarter of the creators surveyed fell into each of the "$50,000 to $100,000" and the "$25,000 to $50,000" categories. CreatorIQ's report included additional data points that help explain the current dynamics of the creator economy. The number of creators receiving payments within CreatorIQ's network more than doubled from 2023 to 2025, which could indicate an overall surge in influencers entering the market. While the average earnings per creator rose to $11,400 in 2025 from $9,200 in 2023, the median actually declined slightly, from $3,500 to $3,000. That suggests that top creators are pulling the average higher, while the typical creator is earning less. What's driving the pay gap Enberg said major advertisers have contributed to the sector's income inequality because they're more likely to allocate their budgets to a small number of top creators. Talent managers who spoke with Business Insider said earnings distribution had been lumpy. Budgets have definitely grown, but they haven't kept pace with the expansion of the creator population, said Kyle Hjelmeseth, CEO of G&B Digital Management. "There are now many more small accounts that will take $25 to post, for example," he said. Meanwhile, advertisers often spend a large chunk of their influencer budgets directly with social media platforms, making it harder for creators — especially smaller ones — to develop direct and potentially lasting relationships with brands, creator-industry insiders said. Becca Bahrke, the CEO of Illuminate Social, a creator management firm, said the CreatorIQ payment concentration data reflect what she's seeing among her own clients. She said she'd seen some full-time creators take the off-ramp to a different job. "You may have earned over $400,000 in one year, but if you're not showing up consistently on the platform, treating it as a full-time job, you can see the earnings fall," Bahrke said. "It's a lot of work. It's not for the faint of heart." Read the original article on Business Insider

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
Inside the US justice department’s probe of Jay Powell
Politics

Inside the US justice department’s probe of Jay Powell

Investigation into Federal Reserve chair’s testimony raises questions around the independence of the country’s judicial arm

1h
3 min
0
Read Article
🎉

You're all caught up!

Check back later for more stories

Back to Home